| 期刊全稱 | Being as Relation in Luce Irigaray | | 影響因子2023 | Emma R. Jones | | 視頻video | http://file.papertrans.cn/184/183016/183016.mp4 | | 發(fā)行地址 | Clarifies the relational ontology that underlies Irigaray’s conceptualization of sexuate difference.Shows that Irigaray’s Heideggerian inheritance illuminates how sexuate difference is ontological.Ide | | 圖書封面 |  | | 影響因子 | Many scholars have struggled with Irigaray’s focus on sexuate difference, in particular with her claim that it is “ontological,” wondering if this implies a problematically na?ve or essentialist account of sexuate difference. As a result, the ethical vision which Irigaray elaborates has not been taken up in a robust way in the fields of philosophy, feminism, or psychoanalysis..By tracing the notion of .relation. throughout Irigaray’s work, this book.?.identifies a rigorous philosophical continuity between the three self-identified “phases” in Irigaray’s thought (despite some critics’ concerns that there is a discontinuity between these phases) and clarifies the relational ontology that underlies Irigaray’s conceptualization of sexuate difference – one that?always already implies an ethical project..The text demonstrates that an understanding of Irigaray’s Heideggerian inheritance – especially prominent in her later texts – is essential to grasping the sense of the idea that sexuate difference is ontological – it concerns Being, rather than beings..?.This book further develops potential applications of this ontological notion of a “relational limit” for the fields of philosophy, fem | | Pindex | Book 2023 |
The information of publication is updating
|
|
|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋|
派博傳思國際
( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328)
GMT+8, 2025-10-11 20:57
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:56:43
