找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Being as Relation in Luce Irigaray; Emma R. Jones Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Sp

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 20607|回復(fù): 40
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:56:43 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
期刊全稱Being as Relation in Luce Irigaray
影響因子2023Emma R. Jones
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/184/183016/183016.mp4
發(fā)行地址Clarifies the relational ontology that underlies Irigaray’s conceptualization of sexuate difference.Shows that Irigaray’s Heideggerian inheritance illuminates how sexuate difference is ontological.Ide
圖書封面Titlebook: Being as Relation in Luce Irigaray;  Emma R. Jones Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Sp
影響因子Many scholars have struggled with Irigaray’s focus on sexuate difference, in particular with her claim that it is “ontological,” wondering if this implies a problematically na?ve or essentialist account of sexuate difference. As a result, the ethical vision which Irigaray elaborates has not been taken up in a robust way in the fields of philosophy, feminism, or psychoanalysis..By tracing the notion of .relation. throughout Irigaray’s work, this book.?.identifies a rigorous philosophical continuity between the three self-identified “phases” in Irigaray’s thought (despite some critics’ concerns that there is a discontinuity between these phases) and clarifies the relational ontology that underlies Irigaray’s conceptualization of sexuate difference – one that?always already implies an ethical project..The text demonstrates that an understanding of Irigaray’s Heideggerian inheritance – especially prominent in her later texts – is essential to grasping the sense of the idea that sexuate difference is ontological – it concerns Being, rather than beings..?.This book further develops potential applications of this ontological notion of a “relational limit” for the fields of philosophy, fem
Pindex Book 2023
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Being as Relation in Luce Irigaray影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Being as Relation in Luce Irigaray影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Being as Relation in Luce Irigaray網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Being as Relation in Luce Irigaray網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Being as Relation in Luce Irigaray被引頻次




書目名稱Being as Relation in Luce Irigaray被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Being as Relation in Luce Irigaray年度引用




書目名稱Being as Relation in Luce Irigaray年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Being as Relation in Luce Irigaray讀者反饋




書目名稱Being as Relation in Luce Irigaray讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

1票 100.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:43:27 | 只看該作者
Muted Receptions: Identity and Sexuate Difference,ce Irigaray’s work have often wondered about the definition, for her, of “sexuate difference,” and some have worried that her work is essentialist or deterministic regarding features that characterize “women” and “men.” I argue here that readers of Irigaray have long struggled to discern the meaning
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:05:29 | 只看該作者
Relation and Refusal: Irigaray with Lacan,the other, the symbolic, the real, and the phallus help us understand how the issue of sexual difference is bound up with this world of shared meaning. In particular, Lacan seems to exclude women or the feminine from the symbolic and indicates that a positive relation between the sexes is impossible
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 05:23:33 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:14:55 | 只看該作者
The Enunciation of Place: Irigaray on Subjectivity, subjects rather than one and its (his) opposite. I further explore the concept of . as a concept that defies the oppositions between form and matter,?or spiritual and material, and propose the idea of “psychic place” as a bodily and linguistic container that, through the perpetual negotiation and a
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:56:52 | 只看該作者
Toward a Relationally Limited Future,upon different others in order to grow and establish its embodied place in the world. I analyze common features seen in cases of domestic violence, suggesting that they are at least in part a result of an underlying denial of woman’s place: a result of the underlying refusal of a relation to alterit
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:20:58 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19305-7Luce Irigaray; Sexuate Difference; Heidegger; Lacan; Ontology
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 00:31:48 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:01:50 | 只看該作者
Emma R. JonesClarifies the relational ontology that underlies Irigaray’s conceptualization of sexuate difference.Shows that Irigaray’s Heideggerian inheritance illuminates how sexuate difference is ontological.Ide
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:47:58 | 只看該作者
http://image.papertrans.cn/b/image/183016.jpg
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-12 00:55
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
固镇县| 青冈县| 桂林市| 灵璧县| 浙江省| 札达县| 印江| 石屏县| 兴宁市| 五台县| 井陉县| 龙泉市| 贺州市| 富平县| 瑞昌市| 怀集县| 托里县| 金塔县| 达尔| 桃园县| 德阳市| 吴忠市| 丹巴县| 临泽县| 镇原县| 剑阁县| 固原市| 寿光市| 克山县| 夏津县| 乌海市| 会东县| 雷波县| 东光县| 德昌县| 乌鲁木齐县| 武胜县| 淮南市| 永康市| 高唐县| 云安县|