Titlebook: Beauty, Ugliness and the Free Play of Imagination; An Approach to Kant‘ Mojca Küplen Book 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerlan

說(shuō)笑

Obvious

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-435-8 Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000, 5:312, p. 190). Nonetheless, a more detailed analysis of Kant’s discussion of disgust and its aesthetic implications, in this and other works, shows that Kant considered disgust to be a phenomenologically and conceptually unique emotion in cont

A簡(jiǎn)潔的

1571-4764 lso applies an interpretation of ugliness in Kant’s aesthetics to resolve certain issues that have been raised in contemporary aesthetics, namely the possibility of appreciating artistic and natural ugliness an978-3-319-36616-6978-3-319-19899-6Series ISSN 1571-4764 Series E-ISSN 2542-9868

Glycogen

ADJ

,Judgments of Taste and Analysis of the Problem of Ugliness in Kant’s Aesthetics,atisfaction without any interest” (KU 5:211, p. 96). On the face of it, Kant’s definition of taste includes both; positive and negative judgments of taste. Moreover, Kant’s term ‘dissatisfaction’ implies not only that negative judgments of taste are those of the non-beautiful (lack of pleasure), but

headway

The Concept of Freedom in the Play of Imagination and Understanding,at none of the proposed solutions were successful, mainly due to Kant’s unsatisfactory formulation of the concept of free harmony constitutive of judgments of taste (of the beautiful). Given this, a positive explanation of ugliness and of the notion of . cannot proceed without first settling on a pr

extrovert

A Positive Account of the Concept of Free Play,he present chapter is to propose a different interpretation of the concept of free harmony; an interpretation that allows the possibility of free disharmony, without violating Kant’s thesis of the necessity of a harmonious relation between imagination and understanding for cognition. Furthermore, th

方便

,The Explanation of Ugliness in Kant’s Aesthetics,in Lorand, . 52(4): 399–406, 1994). This turns out to be particularly true for beauty and its opposite aesthetic concept, ugliness, in Kantian aesthetics. Since Kant’s explanation of judgments of taste is based exclusively on the notion of free harmony, constitutive of judgments of the beautiful alo

粗魯?shù)娜?/a>

HARD

Book 2015can retain our attention and be greatly appreciated. It does this by exploring and refining the most sophisticated and thoroughly worked out theoretical framework of philosophical aesthetics, Kant’s theory of taste, which was put forward in part one of the Critique of the Power of Judgment. The book