Titlebook: Around Classification Theory of Models; Saharon Shelah Book 1986 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1986 Abelian group.Boolean algebra.Fini

輕舟

書目名稱Around Classification Theory of Models影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Around Classification Theory of Models影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Around Classification Theory of Models網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Around Classification Theory of Models網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Around Classification Theory of Models被引頻次




書目名稱Around Classification Theory of Models被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Around Classification Theory of Models年度引用




書目名稱Around Classification Theory of Models年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Around Classification Theory of Models讀者反饋




書目名稱Around Classification Theory of Models讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Armada

formula

Remarks on the numbers of ideals of Boolean algebra and open sets of a topology,ausdorff space .,. then 0. exists, (in fact, the consequences of the covering lemma on cardinal arithmetic are violated). We also prove that if the spread . of a Hausdorff space . satisfies .>?.(.) that the sup is obtained. For regular spaces μ;>2. is enough..Similarly for 3(.) and ..

Explosive

Monadic logic: Hanf Numbers,or models of .. The main result is that if . does not have the independence property even after expanding by monadic predicates (or equivalently (.., 2.)?(., mon) then: ?.(λ).→.(λ).. In Part II we analyze such . getting a decomposition theorem like that in [BSh] (but weaker) (This is needed in part I.)

食料

Findings of the Research Project,Finding a universe . we prove that any quantifier ranging on a family of .-place relations over ., is bi-expressible with a quantifier ranging over a family of equivalence relations, provided that .. Most of the analysis is carried assuming . only and for a stronger equivalence relation, also we find independence results in the other direction.

helper-T-cells

Classifying generalized quantifiers,Finding a universe . we prove that any quantifier ranging on a family of .-place relations over ., is bi-expressible with a quantifier ranging over a family of equivalence relations, provided that .. Most of the analysis is carried assuming . only and for a stronger equivalence relation, also we find independence results in the other direction.

裂隙

On the no(M) for M of singular power,e arbitrary e.g. any .<λ and λ. (hence 2.)..See [Sh 5] for the back ground: where the result were proved for . with relations with infinitely many places. By the present paper the only problem left, if we assume .=., is whether .=., may happen for . of cardinality λ for λ singular.

抵消

博愛家

焦慮

,Particle Accelerator—How Does that Work?,e arbitrary e.g. any .<λ and λ. (hence 2.)..See [Sh 5] for the back ground: where the result were proved for . with relations with infinitely many places. By the present paper the only problem left, if we assume .=., is whether .=., may happen for . of cardinality λ for λ singular.