Titlebook: Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems; Second International Simon Parsons,Nicolas Maudet,Iyad Rahwan Conference proceedings 2006 Springer-Ve

錯(cuò)

有常識(shí)

Nested Argumentation and Its Application to Decision Making over Actionsonflicting arguments, each of which defeat the other, one can then determine the preferred defeat and hence the preferred argument. We then apply this nested argumentation to selection of an agent’s preferred ‘instrumental’ arguments, where each such argument represents a plan of actions for realisi

出來

中世紀(jì)

Formal Handling of Threats and Rewards in a Negotiation Dialogueit to respond in a particular way. Two types of arguments are mainly used for that purpose: . and .. For example, if an agent receives a threat, this agent may accept the offer even if it is not fully “acceptable” for it (because otherwise really important goals would be threatened)..The contributio

最初

Argument-Based Negotiation in a Social Context the agents require the ability to generate arguments, which, in turn, demands four fundamental capabilities: a schema to reason in a social context, a mechanism to identify a suitable set of arguments, a language and a protocol to exchange these arguments, and a decision making functionality to gen

友好

Practical Strategic Reasoning and Adaptation in Rational Argument-Based Negotiations. While significant progress has been made in formalising argument-based communication, (possibly .) agent-level . as a . integration of rational agent reasoning and inter-agent argumentation dialogues have received fairly little attention. In this paper we propose the use of the InFFrA framework i

CUR

Folklore

New Types of Inter-agent Dialogues and Krabbe. In this paper we re-examine the Walton and Krabbe framework, concentrating on the preconditions for different types of dialogue and analyzing them in a systematic way. Doing so identifies a number of new kinds of dialogue missing from the framework. We discuss some of the more interesti

全部逛商店

Debark