Titlebook: Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems; Second International Simon Parsons,Nicolas Maudet,Iyad Rahwan Conference proceedings 2006 Springer-Ve

osteomalacia

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Parameter

Statistics for Computer Experimentstics — the study of language use in actual communication. Pragma dialectics thus combines a dialectical view of argumentative reasonableness with a pragmatic view of the verbal moves made in argumentative discourse. This paper provides an overview of the current state of the pragma-dialectical appro

PALSY

Postulate

Statistics for Computer Experimentse of argument models from the informal logic community. The . of such argument systems is a necessary step if they are to be successfully deployed, and their properties rigorously understood. However, there is as yet no widely accepted approach to the formalisation of argument systems. In this paper

DRAFT

社團(tuán)

生氣的邊緣

https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-32027-Xit to respond in a particular way. Two types of arguments are mainly used for that purpose: . and .. For example, if an agent receives a threat, this agent may accept the offer even if it is not fully “acceptable” for it (because otherwise really important goals would be threatened)..The contributio

Ondines-curse

摸索

Designs for Computer Experimentss. While significant progress has been made in formalising argument-based communication, (possibly .) agent-level . as a . integration of rational agent reasoning and inter-agent argumentation dialogues have received fairly little attention. In this paper we propose the use of the InFFrA framework i

Frequency

Whispering Gallery Modes Microcavity,r, the negotiation process may become more efficient since the other agent can take this reason into account when making new offers. Also, if a reason for rejection can be disputed, the negotiation process may be of higher quality since flawed reasons may be revised as a result. This paper presents