| 期刊全稱(chēng) | Accountability in Social Research | | 期刊簡(jiǎn)稱(chēng) | Issues and Debates | | 影響因子2023 | Norma R. A. Romm | | 視頻video | http://file.papertrans.cn/144/143745/143745.mp4 | | 圖書(shū)封面 |  | | 影響因子 | In this book I have concentrated on drawing attention to various conceptions of accountability that might be brought to bear in judging the practice of social research. Much of the book is organized around making explicit the assumptions that influence what counts as “proper” research in society, including assumptions about how social inquirers might be held accountable. My focus is on reviewing discourses around the practice of “professional” inquiry, with a view to reconsidering the way in which people create expectations for accountable social inquiry. My focus hereon is related to my concern that the manner in which judgments about researchers’ accountability are made, is not without social consequences for our way of living in society. I have approached the issues by beginning with a discussion of tenets of the position called “positivism” (so named by certain proponents), and by considering the view on accountability that is implied by adherence to these tenets. Briefly expressed, positivist argumentation suggests that researchers are required to “do science” in a manner that warrants their being considered, indeed, scientists. I use my discussion of accountability as seen wi | | Pindex | Book 2002 |
The information of publication is updating
|
|
|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋|
派博傳思國(guó)際
( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328)
GMT+8, 2025-10-6 13:32
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:47:52
