找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Ways of Being Bound: Perspectives from post-Kantian Philosophy and Relational Sociology; Patricio A. Fernández,Alejandro Néstor García Mar

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 34707|回復(fù): 74
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:58:04 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Ways of Being Bound: Perspectives from post-Kantian Philosophy and Relational Sociology
編輯Patricio A. Fernández,Alejandro Néstor García Mart
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/1022/1021329/1021329.mp4
概述The first book to examine the topic of “being bound" from both a philosophical and a sociological perspective.A relevant contribution to the contemporary studies on practical normativity.Brings togeth
叢書名稱Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy
圖書封面Titlebook: Ways of Being Bound: Perspectives from post-Kantian Philosophy and Relational Sociology;  Patricio A. Fernández,Alejandro Néstor García Mar
描述.This book addresses the topic of ‘being bound‘ from a philosophical and a sociological perspective. It examines several ways in which we are bound. We are bound to acknowledge the truth and to follow laws; we are bound to others and to the world. Who we are is partly defined by those bonds, regardless of whether we live up to them – or even of whether we acknowledge them. Puzzling questions arise from the fact that we are bound, such as: How are those bonds binding? Wherein lies their normative character? A venerable philosophical tradition, particularly since Kant, has provided an?account of normativity that crucially appeals to such notions as “self-legislation.” But can our normative bonds be properly understood in these essentially first-personal terms? Many argue that our social condition resists any account of those bonds that fails to acknowledge the perspectives of the second and?the third person...The first part of the book explores these themes from a historical perspective in the tradition of transcendental philosophy (Kant, Fichte, Hegel, Husserl and Heidegger); it examines the phenomenon of “being bound”, i.e., why and how we are bound. The second part of the book off
出版日期Book 2022
關(guān)鍵詞German Philosophy from Kant to Heidegger; Relational and Realist Sociology; Moral Bonds; Social Bonds; (
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11469-4
isbn_softcover978-3-031-11471-7
isbn_ebook978-3-031-11469-4Series ISSN 1387-6678 Series E-ISSN 2215-0323
issn_series 1387-6678
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Ways of Being Bound: Perspectives from post-Kantian Philosophy and Relational Sociology影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Ways of Being Bound: Perspectives from post-Kantian Philosophy and Relational Sociology影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ways of Being Bound: Perspectives from post-Kantian Philosophy and Relational Sociology網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Ways of Being Bound: Perspectives from post-Kantian Philosophy and Relational Sociology網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ways of Being Bound: Perspectives from post-Kantian Philosophy and Relational Sociology被引頻次




書目名稱Ways of Being Bound: Perspectives from post-Kantian Philosophy and Relational Sociology被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ways of Being Bound: Perspectives from post-Kantian Philosophy and Relational Sociology年度引用




書目名稱Ways of Being Bound: Perspectives from post-Kantian Philosophy and Relational Sociology年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ways of Being Bound: Perspectives from post-Kantian Philosophy and Relational Sociology讀者反饋




書目名稱Ways of Being Bound: Perspectives from post-Kantian Philosophy and Relational Sociology讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:12:32 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:44:06 | 只看該作者
Commitment: What Is Self-Binding, and How Is It Possible?nds us.” This does not mean that we cannot say what binds us; rather, it means that what binds us does not belong to the order of beings but to .—specifically, what it means to be a self. Being bound by beings presupposes the capacity to bind oneself to oneself. This sounds very much like a version
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:14:00 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:03:49 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:00:22 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 20:41:40 | 只看該作者
Duties to Oneself and Other Ways of Being Bound in Fichte’s Sittenlehremmunity of rational beings. Does this mean that, in Fichte’s ethics, the individual person is irrelevant or even unthinkable as an end in itself? I will argue that this is not the case, and I will propose another way of understanding Fichte’s argumentative strategy on duties to oneself, suggesting a
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:36:37 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:21:49 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:38:09 | 只看該作者
Social Integration and System Integration Re-visitedmechanisms responsible for Morphogenesis to start outstripping Morphostasis (namely, positive, elaborative, feedback prevailing over negative, homeostatic feedback at the macroscopic level.) Part II briefly examines the slippage in Social Integration that accompanies the former: at the macro-level b
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-5 11:16
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
神池县| 板桥市| 启东市| 阿拉善左旗| 哈尔滨市| 句容市| 平顶山市| 吉木萨尔县| 梁河县| 福安市| 亳州市| 龙井市| 绥化市| 金华市| 和林格尔县| 张掖市| 小金县| 连州市| 邢台市| 康马县| 鲁山县| 怀安县| 长子县| 图木舒克市| 横山县| 怀化市| 朝阳县| 乐山市| 衡水市| 高唐县| 独山县| 霍城县| 辉南县| 贞丰县| 于田县| 江陵县| 安化县| 长武县| 滦南县| 丰宁| 巩留县|