Titlebook: Voting Procedures for Electing a Single Candidate; Proving Their (In)Vu Dan S. Felsenthal,Hannu Nurmi Book 2018 The Author(s) 2018 Voting.V

Clinton

書目名稱Voting Procedures for Electing a Single Candidate影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Voting Procedures for Electing a Single Candidate影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Voting Procedures for Electing a Single Candidate網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Voting Procedures for Electing a Single Candidate網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Voting Procedures for Electing a Single Candidate被引頻次




書目名稱Voting Procedures for Electing a Single Candidate被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Voting Procedures for Electing a Single Candidate年度引用




書目名稱Voting Procedures for Electing a Single Candidate年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Voting Procedures for Electing a Single Candidate讀者反饋




書目名稱Voting Procedures for Electing a Single Candidate讀者反饋學科排名

Spongy-Bone

ARK

舔食

描述

Book 2018Procedures for Electing a Single Candidate., published by Springer in 2017, this book aims at giving a comprehensive overview of the most important advantages and disadvantages of procedures thereby assisting decision makers in the choice of a voting procedure that would best suit their purposes.

1分開

Introduction,ecessary ingredient of democratic government. Yet there are numerous voting rules that differ from each other in processing the ballots into voting results. In other words, it is possible that for a given set of voters having a fixed distribution of preferences among the competing alternatives, one

祖先

Voting Paradoxes,nal ones. The simple paradoxes are paradoxes where the relevant data lead to a ‘surprising’ and arguably undesirable outcome, whereas the conditional paradoxes are ones where the change in one relevant datum while holding constant the other relevant data leads to a ‘surprising’ and arguably undesira

BRAND

Hirsutism

The (In)Vulnerability of Non-Ranked Voting Procedures to Various Paradoxes,, Approval Voting, and Successive Elimination), we discuss, for each procedure, those voting paradoxes to which the procedures are immune and the reasons for this, as well as demonstrate, with the aid of illustrative examples, their vulnerability to other paradoxes.

forecast

,The (In)Vulnerability of Ranked Voting Procedures that Are Not Condorcet–Consistent to Various Paraprocedure, Range Voting and Majority Judgment) to 13 paradoxes is examined in this chapter. For those systems that are vulnerable to some voting paradoxes the vulnerability is demonstrated through illustrative examples showing that there are profiles where the paradoxes in question happen when the r