Titlebook: Visual Prosthetics; Physiology, Bioengin Gislin Dagnelie Book 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011 rehabilitation psychology

弄混

書目名稱Visual Prosthetics影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Visual Prosthetics影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Visual Prosthetics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Visual Prosthetics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Visual Prosthetics被引頻次




書目名稱Visual Prosthetics被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Visual Prosthetics年度引用




書目名稱Visual Prosthetics年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Visual Prosthetics讀者反饋




書目名稱Visual Prosthetics讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

圓木可阻礙

Xoana G. Troncoso,Stephen L. Macknik,Susana Martinez-Condeief account of the anatomy and blood supply of the anterior part of the optic nerve, which consists of the optic nerve head and retrolaminar optic nerve, is an essential prerequisite. As far as the arterial blood supply of the optic nerve is concerned, the optic nerve head and retrolaminar region fo

放大

Seminar

CULP

his ‘droogs’, and judges everyone he meets by how they speak. Alex’s acts of deception depend on his ability to imitate others’ language usage but he gets arrested when his preferred ‘Nadsat’ is recognised by one of his victims. It is not only Alex’s individual speech acts, however, which confront a

暫時(shí)過來

Aditi Ray,James D. Weilandlborough and Prince Eugene.. There survive two letters which he wrote from Amsterdam to Desmaizeaux, letters mainly concerning books and booksellers.. He made the acquaintance of Desmaizeaux’s friend de la Motte, a literary middleman of Amsterdam, who had for some years been forwarding him books fro

翅膀拍動(dòng)

James Loudin,Alexander Butterwick,Philip Huie,Daniel Palankeras British Labour’s most influential manifesto since Durbin’s . in 1940 if not since Tawney’s . in 1931. Anthony Crosland’s important contribution to the theory of the middle ground was published in 1956. Two decades late . was still describing it as ‘a(chǎn) great seminal work which … remains the main in

Mettle

NICHE

Insubordinate

Elias Greenbaum,Barbara R. Evans the way we live now than many readers have understood: these are the persuasions of such critics as Ruth apRoberts and James Kincaid. Mrs apRoberts’s book has an American title (.),. but the more sensitively pun-minded English publishers evidently decided that the book should be entirely unambiguou