Titlebook: Virtue Ethics: Retrospect and Prospect; Elisa Grimi Book 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 Virtue ethics and other-directed moral j

人類學家

excrete

Some Complexities of Categorizing Character Traits,er traits. This paper distinguishes three approaches—what I call the Stoic, personality psychology, and Aristotelian—and critically assesses each of them. The Stoic approaches denies that virtues come in degrees. There is perfect virtue or nothing at all. The personality psychology approach denies t

細胞學

使服水土

Virtue Ethics, Teleology, and Religion in the Aristotelian Tradition,s knowable not only through reason, but takes on a more specific character vis-à-vis claims about divine revelation, in particular and perhaps most importantly as regards the final end of humanity. Consequently, those acts and habits which are considered virtuous in the natural ordering of man also

貴族

Virtue Without Law? A Problem and Prospect for Virtue Ethics,ich I refer is the inability of many virtue ethicists to understand properly the relationship between law and virtue. This essay will unfold in four sections. First, we will discuss the causes of this inability among virtue ethicists to see clearly the connection between law and virtue. We will focu

GRE

atrophy

The Big Risk Behind the Explosion of Virtues,iations, and foundations on virtues have been founded. But what is behind this phenomenon? The recovery of virtue ethics was initiated by Elizabeth Anscombe, re-launched by Alasdair MacIntyre, and has now been developed by many authors in a contemporary context. Virtue ethics has now become its own

engrossed

Proliferating Virtues: A Clear and Present Danger?,fer my own. Russell (Practical intelligence and the virtues. Oxford University Press, Oxford, .) takes the first approach, arguing that virtue ethical right action is impossible unless we adopt a finite and specifiable list of the virtues. I argue against this. Hursthouse (Working virtue: virtue eth

PANG

Sacrifice in Eudaimonistic Virtue Ethics,l or consequentialist) will be so demanding upon an agent’s time and resources that she will not be able to pursue her own flourishing, a good human life as she conceives it. Proponents of eudaimonistic virtue ethics must confront an inverted form of the demandingness objection, namely that their th

conception

Book 2019ilities, as well as risks. This volume has been written to contribute a multi-faceted perspective to the current conversation about virtue. Among many other thought-provoking questions, the collection addresses the following: What are the virtues, and how are they enumerated? What are the internal p