Titlebook: Virginia Woolf‘s Essays; Sketching the Past Elena Gualtieri Book 2000 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2000 b

警察在苦笑

書目名稱Virginia Woolf‘s Essays影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Virginia Woolf‘s Essays影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Virginia Woolf‘s Essays網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Virginia Woolf‘s Essays網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Virginia Woolf‘s Essays被引頻次




書目名稱Virginia Woolf‘s Essays被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Virginia Woolf‘s Essays年度引用




書目名稱Virginia Woolf‘s Essays年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Virginia Woolf‘s Essays讀者反饋




書目名稱Virginia Woolf‘s Essays讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

NOCT

Elena Gualtierin international politics and, particularly so, in reference to the leading traditions of thought and practice in international politics. Nevertheless, the principal focus of attention, in regard to Hobbes and international studies, lies with international law, and with this being assumed to comprehe

摻假

Elena Gualtieriel that its focus is insufficiently sharp and her central contentions about Hobbes’s concept of right strike me as misguided. In what follows I shall try to substantiate this claim and also sketch the outlines of what I regard as a more adequate view of Hobbes on natural right.

FEMUR

Ascendancy

encyclopedia

墻壁

Professing Literature,one hand, there is her awareness of the importance of the professionalisation of women’s writing as an instrument of emancipation. On the other, there is her suspicion, as a writer and a reader, of the institutionalisation of literature and of the professional critic as a figure that symbolises a re

沙草紙

Ejaculate

Postscript: Angels and Harpies,ddressing the question of Woolf’s relationship to literary history, both in terms of the history she wrote and in terms of the history that has been written about her. In their turn, Woolf’s writings on history, women and the essay were deployed to read critically and help to contextualise the idea

Hormones

Elena Gualtierihe argues that promises and contracts made under coercion are morally binding.. Hobbes develops three different arguments to ground this claim. First, he writes that the idea that contracts and promises made under coercion may be considered non-binding entails the anarchistic conclusion that no subj