Titlebook: Verification of Reactive Systems; Formal Methods and A Klaus Schneider Textbook 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004 Automat.Variabl

積聚

書目名稱Verification of Reactive Systems影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Verification of Reactive Systems影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Verification of Reactive Systems網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Verification of Reactive Systems網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Verification of Reactive Systems被引頻次




書目名稱Verification of Reactive Systems被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Verification of Reactive Systems年度引用




書目名稱Verification of Reactive Systems年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Verification of Reactive Systems讀者反饋




書目名稱Verification of Reactive Systems讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Definitive

Conclusions, idea followed in this book is to exploit these hierarchies such that the least expressive logic is chosen with the most efficient verification procedure. In this final section, we will briefly summarize the content of the book, and give remarks on topics that are not covered by the book.

用不完

CORE

Isthmus

Accolade

做方舟

Herbivorous

Fixpoint Calculi,but none of them reaches the expressiveness of the .-calculus. The development of the .-calculus started in 1975, when Kfoury and Park proved that properties like termination and totality of programs can not be expressed in first order logics [283] (see also Section 6.2.2). For this reason, Park [39

Inertia

Finite Automata,ata and finite state automata form a hierarchy that is in a beautiful correspondence to the Chomsky hierarchy of formal languages [251]. Common to all of these machines is that they have a finite set of internal states that determine their behavior, and that they read an input word from a tape. The

Affection

Temporal Logics,ms. We have already seen that every formula of our logic of .-automata .. can be translated to an equivalent .-calculus formula, but that the converse is, in general, not possible. The reason for this is that .-calculus formulas of alternation depth 2 were sufficient to capture .., and hence, there