Titlebook: Varieties of Scientific Realism; Objectivity and Trut Evandro Agazzi Book 2017 Springer International Publishing AG 2017 Scientific realism

忘恩負(fù)義的人

解凍

The Debates on Scientific Realism Today: Knowledge and Objectivity in Science,t, the possibility of theoretical knowledge is often denied because of the empirical underdetermination of theories. Realists rely on explanatory power, theoretical virtues, and instrumental but theory-free observation to solve this problem. Besides, they use the . for the truth of successful theori

modish

The Truth of Theories and Scientific Realism,attain truth, something that historically occurred at the end of the nineteenth century. Therefore, the requirement of truth was removed from science and replaced by the requirement of objectivity. This has a ‘weak’ sense, according to which scientific knowledge is ‘independent of the single subject

我怕被刺穿

Strict Empiricism Versus Explanation in Sciencel scientific theories, and in scientific realism, which explains that theories are successful because they are true. This is denied by strict empiricists, according to whom only empirical evidence should determine theory-choice: for them there is no difference between a theory T, and its “surrealist

媒介

褲子

largesse

Robustness, Intersubjective Reproducibility, and Scientific Realismut as against variations in parameter values; (3) Robustness as consilience of results from different and independent hypotheses, procedures or sources of evidence. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the last two meanings of robustness, in order to cope with some difficulties with which robustn

EVADE

油氈

不利

The Epistemological Problem of the Objectivity of Knowledgefore the problem of human knowledge from the point of view of its intrinsic objectivity. From this point of view reflection on human knowledge allows to redefine the map of objective knowledge criticizing all forms of scientism. Knowledge in each subject area is characterized by rigor and public int