找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Validating Psychological Constructs; Historical, Philosop Kathleen Slaney Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 Co

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 52755|回復(fù): 46
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:07:06 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Validating Psychological Constructs
副標(biāo)題Historical, Philosop
編輯Kathleen Slaney
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/981/980261/980261.mp4
概述Explores the history and development of construct validity theory (CVT) in relation to the broader domain of psychological measurement.Critically examines CVT in a broader context.Brings together hist
叢書(shū)名稱(chēng)Palgrave Studies in the Theory and History of Psychology
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: Validating Psychological Constructs; Historical, Philosop Kathleen Slaney Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 Co
描述This book critically examines the historical and philosophical foundations of construct validity theory (CVT), and how these have and continue to inform and constrain the conceptualization of validity and its application in research. CVT has had an immense impact on how researchers in the behavioural sciences conceptualize and approach their subject matter. Yet, there is equivocation regarding the foundations of the CVT framework as well as ambiguities concerning the nature of the “constructs” that are its raison d’etre. The book is organized in terms of three major parts that speak, respectively, to the historical, philosophical, and pragmatic dimensions of CVT. The primary objective is to provide researchers and students with a critical lens through which a deeper understanding may be gained of both the utility and limitations of CVT and the validation practices to which it has given rise.?
出版日期Book 2017
關(guān)鍵詞Construct Validity Theory; Classical Test Theory; Modern Test Theory; Loevinger; Spearman; Philosophy of
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-38523-9
isbn_softcover978-1-349-67805-1
isbn_ebook978-1-137-38523-9Series ISSN 2946-2452 Series E-ISSN 2946-2460
issn_series 2946-2452
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Validating Psychological Constructs影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Validating Psychological Constructs影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Validating Psychological Constructs網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Validating Psychological Constructs網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Validating Psychological Constructs被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Validating Psychological Constructs被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Validating Psychological Constructs年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Validating Psychological Constructs年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Validating Psychological Constructs讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Validating Psychological Constructs讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:44:14 | 只看該作者
Introduction,construct’ concept and the ripple effects of its introduction into the psychological literature from the late 1940s to early 1950s. The chapter also provides a description of important discrepancies in the published literature concerning both the ‘construct’ concept and the utility of CVT as a valid
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:29:11 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:01:32 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:41:06 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:07:54 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:03:32 | 只看該作者
The Philosophical Backdrop of Construct Validityportant developments in the philosophy of science from the mid-1920s to the early 1960s. Emphasis is placed on the distinction between logical positivism and scientific realism and on key areas of difference between them. Also described is the transition between the heavily empiricist doctrines of l
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:36:52 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:10:55 | 只看該作者
Some Conceptual Housecleaningluding the ever-evasive ‘construct’ concept and its progenitor, the ‘hypothetical construct.’ The various ontological stances that have been adopted regarding constructs are summarized. Concrete examples of confusing or otherwise ambiguous uses of these terms are given, and a common but pernicious t
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:39:22 | 只看該作者
Construct Validation: View from the “Trenches”1990s to current. The chapter then shifts in focus from scholarship . how to validate constructs to a description of construct validation research . lived and practiced. The major findings from a fairly recent body of empirical research dedicated to the examination of psychometric reporting and vali
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-5 23:31
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
文成县| 龙南县| 体育| 玉树县| 镇平县| 伊金霍洛旗| 嫩江县| 大名县| 上杭县| 海伦市| 泰顺县| 雅江县| 和硕县| 塔城市| 隆子县| 温宿县| 礼泉县| 黄石市| 泽州县| 广水市| 永吉县| 澄迈县| 明光市| 平武县| 唐山市| 南宁市| 涞源县| 许昌县| 剑河县| 佛教| 青冈县| 平顺县| 张家界市| 道孚县| 孟州市| 荆门市| 孝感市| 赤峰市| 板桥市| 云南省| 武汉市|