找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Vague Objects and Vague Identity; New Essays on Ontic Ken Akiba,Ali Abasnezhad Book 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014 Bo

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 36315|回復(fù): 51
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:16:52 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Vague Objects and Vague Identity
副標(biāo)題New Essays on Ontic
編輯Ken Akiba,Ali Abasnezhad
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/981/980240/980240.mp4
概述An original contribution to the literature and offers explanations to well known issues in onticism, vague identities and other important questions.Features work by renowned authorities from a variety
叢書名稱Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science
圖書封面Titlebook: Vague Objects and Vague Identity; New Essays on Ontic  Ken Akiba,Ali Abasnezhad Book 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014 Bo
描述.This unique anthology of new, contributed essays offers a range of perspectives on various aspects of ontic vagueness. It seeks to answer core questions pertaining to onticism, the view that vagueness exists in the world itself. The questions to be addressed include whether vague objects must have vague identity, and whether ontic vagueness has a distinctive logic, one that is not shared by semantic or epistemic vagueness. The essays in this volume explain the motivations behind onticism, such as the plausibility of mereological vagueness and indeterminacy in quantum mechanics and they offer various arguments both for and against ontic vagueness; onticism is also compared with other, competing theories of vagueness such as semanticism, the view that vagueness exists only in our linguistic representation of the world..Gareth Evans’s influential paper of 1978, “Can There Be Vague Objects?” gave a simple but cogent argument against the coherence of ontic vagueness.?Onticism was subsequently dismissed by many. However, in recent years, researchers have become aware of the logical gaps in Evans’s argument and this has triggered a new wave of interest in onticism. Onticism is now widely
出版日期Book 2014
關(guān)鍵詞Boolean-valued sets as value sets; Gareth Evans‘ Argument; Gareth Evans’ proof; Mereological Vagueness;
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7978-5
isbn_softcover978-94-024-0105-9
isbn_ebook978-94-007-7978-5Series ISSN 2214-9775 Series E-ISSN 2214-9783
issn_series 2214-9775
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Vague Objects and Vague Identity影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Vague Objects and Vague Identity影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Vague Objects and Vague Identity網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Vague Objects and Vague Identity網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Vague Objects and Vague Identity被引頻次




書目名稱Vague Objects and Vague Identity被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Vague Objects and Vague Identity年度引用




書目名稱Vague Objects and Vague Identity年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Vague Objects and Vague Identity讀者反饋




書目名稱Vague Objects and Vague Identity讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:04:43 | 只看該作者
Boolean-Valued Sets as Vague Sets 0 and 1, but the values are Boolean-structured and only partially ordered, so we cannot turn them into meaningful numerical degrees in [0,1]. The identity relation between two sets is also given various values, depending on the values of the membership relations involving the two sets; so this theory also endorses vague identity among sets.
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:51:51 | 只看該作者
Introduction,that is, the argument from ordinary objects, the argument from semantic indeterminacy, the argument from quantum mechanics, and Evans’s argument. It then attempts to clarify often confusing uses of such terms as “ontic vagueness,” “vague objects,” “vague existence,” and “vague identity.” The final s
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:30:23 | 只看該作者
Mereological Indeterminacy: Metaphysical but Not Fundamentalsource in how we represent the world, there is an increasing interest in the position that some mereological indeterminacy has its source in how the world is, independently of how we represent it—that is, the position that some mereological indeterminacy is metaphysical. Those attracted to metaphysi
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:54:34 | 只看該作者
A Linguistic Account of Mereological Vaguenesschapter is to develop an alternative linguistic account of vague mereological claims. I propose that vagueness in ordinary mereological claims is typically due, not to imprecision in singular terms, but to imprecision in . such as the relational predicate “is part of.” Though my account is not probl
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 14:52:19 | 只看該作者
Vague Objects in Quantum Mechanics?s. It is optimistic about making some connections with the mainstream vague objects literature, for example, E. J. Lowe’s “referential indeterminacy with an ontic source”. Going further, in particular, connecting that literature with the “nonindividuals” approach of Steven French and Décio Krause is
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:46:31 | 只看該作者
Vague Personske sense of resilient disagreements between disputants by appealing to certain features of language, the world, or our knowledge thereof, more familiarly found in the literature on vagueness. Recently, however, it has been argued that when we reflect on the nature of persons at, and across, time, we
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 21:50:10 | 只看該作者
Indiscriminable but Not Identical Looks: Non-vague Phenomenal Predicates and Phenomenal Propertiesver at a particular instant of time if and only if they look the same to that observer at that particular instant of time. I argue that this deep-rooted assumption may be false. The argument is in two steps. First, it is argued that indiscriminability between appearances may be non-transitive. Then
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 02:38:55 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:17:13 | 只看該作者
Boolean-Valued Sets as Vague Setss to radically revise them in order to remove this feature. Whereas the original theory assigns any real number in [0,1] to a proposition or set membership, the revised theory, called ., assigns a value in a Boolean lattice structure . = ?.,∧,∨,.,0,1?; consequently, “. or not-.” will receive value 1
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-7 22:41
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
遂川县| 普陀区| 获嘉县| 万盛区| 天峻县| 墨脱县| 惠安县| 科技| 樟树市| 阳山县| 武穴市| 新乡市| 高安市| 辽宁省| 龙胜| 西乌| 中卫市| 鄂尔多斯市| 西华县| 三亚市| 墨脱县| 鲁山县| 龙江县| 彭阳县| 宜丰县| 澜沧| 嘉祥县| 平阴县| 车致| 全州县| 正镶白旗| 海城市| 从江县| 虹口区| 周宁县| 浠水县| 于都县| 武宁县| 沧源| 游戏| 乌兰县|