找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Use of the UNIDROIT Principles to Interpret and Supplement Domestic Contract Law; Alejandro Garro,José Antonio Moreno Rodríguez Conference

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 反抗日本
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 05:31:27 | 只看該作者
The UNIDROIT Principles As Reference for the Uniform Interpretation of National Laws: National Repoation practice is shown, with a focus on possibly complementing other rules of uniform law. Then selected provisions of the UPICC are compared with potential counterparts in Austrian contract law, in order to identify similarities facilitating the reference to UPICC rules or disparities making it mo
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 11:29:59 | 只看該作者
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 12:12:28 | 只看該作者
The UNIDROIT Principles As Reference for the Uniform Interpretation of National Laws: Chile,ilean law. Following, the author reviews several provisions of the UPICC and performs an analysis of whether they have counterparts in Chilean contract law. The author concludes by signaling several aspects of the domestic contract law that could be complemented with the UPICC in the years to come.
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 16:27:21 | 只看該作者
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 23:30:49 | 只看該作者
UNIDROIT Principles As Reference for Uniform Interpretation of National Laws: Czech Republic,ech contract law. Under Czech legal doctrine the UPICC are part of . and not considered as a generally binding set of legal rules. However, contracting parties are free to make them part of their contract. The authors carry out a comparative analysis of selected UPICC rules and their counterparts in
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 02:20:57 | 只看該作者
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 08:15:40 | 只看該作者
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 11:49:58 | 只看該作者
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 12:54:15 | 只看該作者
The Unidroit Principles of International Commercial Contracts (UPICC) as Reference for the Uniform anism, as State Courts interpret the domestic law as restrictive in favor of State Law. The use of instruments such as the UPICC, however, is allowed to both judges and arbitrators for supplementary or interpretative purposes. Yet, there are no reported cases of Guatemalan courts having used the UPI
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 20:16:07 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-18 06:09
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
荆州市| 沾益县| 饶河县| 麻城市| 阳山县| 宁远县| 剑阁县| 高淳县| 金湖县| 谢通门县| 长乐市| 陕西省| 黄梅县| 铜鼓县| 德钦县| 比如县| 云林县| 博野县| 孝感市| 竹北市| 广南县| 措美县| 邯郸市| 宜川县| 天等县| 焦作市| 呼伦贝尔市| 南阳市| 正安县| 琼中| 武平县| 丹寨县| 喀喇沁旗| 神木县| 奉节县| 璧山县| 莱州市| 沁源县| 云霄县| 天台县| 台南市|