Titlebook: University Responsibility for the Adjudication of Research Misconduct; The Science Bubble Stefan Franzen Book 2021 Springer Nature Switzerl

粗糙濫制

側(cè)面左右

我們的面粉

The Institutional Pressure to Become a Professor-Entrepreneur,volous allegations? There is no doubt that the pressures to seek funding are taking a toll on faculty and affecting the ethical climate. Universities have focused on productivity above all else and since the federal regulations have put them in charge of adjudication, there is a brewing crisis.

FAST

Anal-Canal

University Administration of Scientific Ethics,sities involved. The two universities involved acted exclusively in their own financial interest. One had interests in maintaining intellectual property, equity stakes, and protection the investment in new faculty members (and their grants) and the other university wished to avoid a lawsuit, which s

indicate

,Behind the Fa?ade of Self-Correcting Science,for that purpose. They are intended for new, fresh research. An author may not point out that other’s data are, in fact, misrepresented and not supported by the primary sources. Self-correction is a convenient myth that allows people to put an ugly reality out of their minds. However, the myth is br

infarct

Dorsal

neolith

The Legal Repercussions of Institutional Conflict of Interest,ecessary? Does the informant have a grudge? The National Science Foundation has no involvement in the conduct of a university investigation until the case is completed and a final report is submitted. Only then would the NSF even comment on the conduct. Usually, the NSF reserves any comments for its

柔軟

Bursting the Science Bubble,ofound effect on their research practices. Indeed, the Office of Inspector General can remain for the recalcitrant cases, repeat offenders or when financial wrongdoing warrants involvement of law enforcement. In this final chapter, I propose one possible means to administer this scientific approach