找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Unity, Truth and the Liar; The Modern Relevance Shahid Rahman,Tero Tulenheimo,Emmanuel Genot Book 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

[復制鏈接]
樓主: fumble
41#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 16:15:56 | 只看該作者
42#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 19:22:49 | 只看該作者
43#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 01:58:49 | 只看該作者
44#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 03:50:00 | 只看該作者
Comments on Stephen Read’s “The Truth-Schema and the Liar”ates it using the resources of modern logic. His formulation seems to me to be impeccable. He also gives a pointed criticism of another medieval view (the view that every sentence says of itself that it is true). Attempts to provide a definition of truth for a language that contains a truth predicat
45#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 09:41:51 | 只看該作者
Models for Liars in Bradwardine’s Theory of Truth I give models for Read‘s formulation of Bradwardine‘s theory of truth, and I examine the behaviour of liar sentences in those models. I conclude by examining Bradwardine‘s argument to the effect that if something signifies itself to be untrue then it signifies itself to be true as well. We will see
46#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 13:18:13 | 只看該作者
On a New Account of the Liarthe Liar paradox using an improved formulation of Tarski‘s T-scheme. Examining the orthodox and the new account of the Liar shows two different ways of tackling the problem of modelling the underlying logic of Liar-type discourse. Specific discussion is provided of Read‘s key notions of . and ., whi
47#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 17:31:16 | 只看該作者
The Liar Cannot Be Solvedhe claims turns the Liar paradox into an innocent sentence, which is simply false. In my note I examine the way Read tries to solve the paradox and argue that some doubts can be raised regarding the successfulness of his attempt. I analyze his project from two independent points of view. First, I tr
48#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 19:53:07 | 只看該作者
Out of the Liar TangleBut underlying them is a grammatical point that has much wider repercussions. For it generates, on its own, a more straight forward way of understanding what gets people into a tangle with Liar and Strengthened Liar sentences, and that leads to a much fuller, critical assessment of the line of appro
49#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 00:23:30 | 只看該作者
50#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 05:03:25 | 只看該作者
Restrictionism: A Medieval Approach Revisitedtionism has been popular in the thirteenth and early fourteenth century, and then rapidly lost ground to rival theories such as Bradwar-dine‘s. The aim of this paper is twofold: (1) to explain what medieval restrictionism amounted to as a matter of historical fact and why it came to be abandoned; (2
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-5 00:34
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
宜城市| 嫩江县| 额敏县| 凌海市| 白山市| 佛冈县| 河间市| 孝昌县| 浑源县| 甘泉县| 石楼县| 花垣县| 宾川县| 拜城县| 辛集市| 兰考县| 万安县| 长宁区| 扎鲁特旗| 浮山县| 阿拉善左旗| 五大连池市| 天长市| 象山县| 济南市| 黄大仙区| 托里县| 横峰县| 怀远县| 苗栗市| 诏安县| 台南县| 章丘市| 门头沟区| 龙州县| 长白| 缙云县| 钦州市| 元江| 宝清县| 博罗县|