Titlebook: United States Foreign Policy towards Cambodia, 1977–92; A Question of Realit Christopher Brady Book 1999 Christopher Brady 1999 bibliograph

Infinitesimal

disparage

ungainly

Contemporary History in Contexthttp://image.papertrans.cn/u/image/942117.jpg

慎重

現(xiàn)實(shí)

Conclusion,ere in any way concerned with Cambodia. For example, the relative lack of influence of Caspar Weinberger and Harold Brown on the Cambodian issue became obvious during searches through the documentary evidence. Although both were powerful figures, other than when Cambodia threatened to involve the Department of Defence they were disinterested.

KIN

有說(shuō)服力

2947-0005 e story up to 1997. As an examination of US foreign policy within decision-making elites it makes a contribution to decision-making theory and foreign policy analysis as well as providing insights into regional politics.978-1-349-14847-9978-1-349-14845-5Series ISSN 2947-0005 Series E-ISSN 2947-0013

entail

DOSE

,The Carter Administration, 1977–81,oreign policy which reflected and promoted America’s domestic values. Given such a predisposition towards human rights issues it might have been reasonable to assume that Cambodia would be high on his agenda for action. It was also reasonable to assume that when President Carter made his inaugural a

完成

,The First Reagan Administration, 1981–85,mic: ‘These United States are confronted with an economic affliction of great proportions.’ The second concern was the intrusiveness of government: ‘In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.’ Both concerns highlighted the predominant Reaganite