Titlebook: Understanding Wittgenstein; Royal Institute of Philosophy Book 1974 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1974 Lu

Shuttle

,The ‘Prejudice in Favour of Psychophysical Parallelism’, at 605 with the claim that ‘One of the most dangerous ideas for a philosopher is, oddly enough, that we think with our heads or in our heads’. Subsequent sections develop this remark in a way that demonstrates Wittgenstein’s rejection of the view that thinking is any sort of process in the head, wh

Radiculopathy

Silent Soliloquy, frequently say things to themselves in such a way that not even a close observer has any reason to think they have done so. It is therefore tempting to suppose that on such occasions a sequence of surrogate speech sounds is produced in the person’s head which he alone hears or introaudits, as if wh

Interregnum

里程碑

,Wittgenstein’s Theory of Knowledge,s he says, ‘specialized’. This is not, as I shall show, a very important issue in itself, but it leads on to other points, of more interest: how it comes about, for example, that ‘not all corrections of our beliefs are on the same level’. I shall then discuss the idea that we inherit a certain pictu

全國(guó)性

蒙太奇

lambaste

無(wú)畏

How to Read Wittgenstein, we came out of the lecture room he said to me ‘That was a strange experience. I have a clear memory of all that from my early years in Cambridge. And yet in some ways it was like hearing a lecture on Spinoza.’

Ordeal

Other Minds,sily ‘see through’ — or in respect of how they . be answered. Yet there is material in what he says elsewhere in the . and in other of his later writings. for a manysided and, I think, useful development of the comparison. Anyway, that is what I shall attempt in this lecture..

DIKE