找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Truth in Fiction; Rethinking its Logic John Woods Book 2018 Springer International Publishing AG 2018 Semantics of fictional discourse.Pret

[復制鏈接]
查看: 14789|回復: 35
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:42:56 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Truth in Fiction
副標題Rethinking its Logic
編輯John Woods
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/931/930644/930644.mp4
概述Examines truth in fiction from the point of view of a naturalized logic.Dismisses orthodox positions on reference and truth, and the machinery of formal semantics.Advances an account of propositions u
叢書名稱Synthese Library
圖書封面Titlebook: Truth in Fiction; Rethinking its Logic John Woods Book 2018 Springer International Publishing AG 2018 Semantics of fictional discourse.Pret
描述.This monograph examines truth in fiction by applying the techniques of a naturalized logic of human cognitive practices. The author structures his project around two focal questions. What would it take to write a book about truth in literary discourse with reasonable promise of getting it right? What would it take to write a book about truth in fiction as true to the facts of lived literary experience as objectivity allows?.It is argued that the most semantically distinctive feature of the sentences of fiction is that they are.unambiguously?.true and false together. It is true that Sherlock Holmes lived at 221B Baker Street and also concurrently false that he did. A second distinctive feature of fiction is that the reader at large knows of this inconsistency and isn’t in the least cognitively molested by it. Why, it is asked, would this be so? What would explain it?.Two answers are developed. According to the?.no-contradiction thesis., the semantically tangled sentences of fiction are indeed logically inconsistent but not logically contradictory. According to the?.no-bother thesis., if the inconsistencies of fiction were contradictory, a properly contrived logic for the rational m
出版日期Book 2018
關鍵詞Semantics of fictional discourse; Pretendism; Causal response epistemology; Semantic illusion; Lived rea
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72658-8
isbn_softcover978-3-030-10245-6
isbn_ebook978-3-319-72658-8Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292
issn_series 0166-6991
copyrightSpringer International Publishing AG 2018
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Truth in Fiction影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Truth in Fiction影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Truth in Fiction網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Truth in Fiction網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Truth in Fiction被引頻次




書目名稱Truth in Fiction被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Truth in Fiction年度引用




書目名稱Truth in Fiction年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Truth in Fiction讀者反饋




書目名稱Truth in Fiction讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:37:30 | 只看該作者
第130644主題貼--第2樓 (沙發(fā))
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:51:48 | 只看該作者
板凳
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 04:35:43 | 只看該作者
第4樓
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:50:44 | 只看該作者
5樓
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:02:47 | 只看該作者
6樓
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:48:50 | 只看該作者
7樓
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 21:20:53 | 只看該作者
8樓
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:48:14 | 只看該作者
9樓
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:54:51 | 只看該作者
10樓
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-28 16:55
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
扬中市| 嫩江县| 拜泉县| 绥阳县| 章丘市| 鸡东县| 长丰县| 古浪县| 山阳县| 陵川县| 禹城市| 大关县| 广平县| 新巴尔虎左旗| 睢宁县| 云梦县| 南澳县| 仪征市| 永春县| 化德县| 库车县| 象州县| 绥阳县| 鸡东县| 昭觉县| 商河县| 玛曲县| 义马市| 陇南市| 武义县| 什邡市| 乌拉特中旗| 习水县| 商南县| 和林格尔县| 康定县| 河东区| 黄骅市| 武穴市| 天镇县| 陇川县|