Titlebook: Topics in Conditional Logic; Donald Nute Book 1980 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1980 Jackson Pollock.conditional.decis

警察在苦笑

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Topics in Conditional Logic影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Topics in Conditional Logic影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Topics in Conditional Logic網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Topics in Conditional Logic網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Topics in Conditional Logic被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Topics in Conditional Logic被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Topics in Conditional Logic年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Topics in Conditional Logic年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Topics in Conditional Logic讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Topics in Conditional Logic讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

GLEAN

軟膏

Alternative Model Theories,itionals. These include Chellas (1975), Hansson and G?rdenfors (1973), Lewis (1973), Pollock (1976), and Stalnaker (1968). We can view such analyses as involving two distinct but related parts: the formal semantics or model theory itself and the informal account or intended interpretation which unde

Amnesty

銀版照相

Subjunctive Probabilities,al probability different from p(B/A). This is the probability that B . be the case if A . the case, which I will symbolize as p(B//A). To see the difference, at least in the case of subjective probabilities, let A be ‘Jones rolls a pair of fair dice at exactly 3 p.m. EST, January 1, 1980’ and let B

admission

Algebraic Semantics,w the example of Lewis (1973) in segregating this more technical material at the end of the volume, but locating it where it is, made subsequent discussion of the philosophical merits of these model theories in Chapter 4 much easier. As is well known, the possible worlds semantics was developed earl

畢業(yè)典禮

Classical vs Non-Classical Logics,rating some disagreement among the majority of these philosophers who have expressed an opinion on the subject. Of course, even . is too strong for necessitation conditionals. For the conditionals we are now considering, though, we will take . to be a . on the proper logic for such conditionals.

獸群

Causation and the Temporal Regularity of Subjunctive Conditionals,aw in his analysis of causation as well. Both of these very similar accounts fail, I think, for reasons which make it very unlikely that any such explication of causation will succeed. To show this will be the primary task for the next section of this chapter.

拱形面包

Algebraic Semantics,d (1979), and van Fraassen’s (1976). In this chapter, algebraic semantics for conditional logics will be presented following the line of development of my two earlier papers and in many ways parallelling Lemmon’s work in modal logics.

MOAT