Titlebook: Topic and Focus; Cross-Linguistic Per Chungmin Lee,Matthew Gordon,Daniel Büring Book 20071st edition Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2

多愁善感

書目名稱Topic and Focus影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Topic and Focus影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Topic and Focus網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Topic and Focus網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Topic and Focus被引頻次




書目名稱Topic and Focus被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Topic and Focus年度引用




書目名稱Topic and Focus年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Topic and Focus讀者反饋




書目名稱Topic and Focus讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

compose

被告

Focus and Taiwanese Unchecked Tones,that (1) f0 range of narrow focused syllables was expanded and (2) together, mean f0 value and expansion of f0 range distinguish focus conditions. Comparison between f0 and duration data showed that duration was more consistently used to distinguish focus condition than f0 range and mean f0 value in Taiwanese.

偏狂癥

venous-leak

,Prosody and Scope Interpretations of the Topic Marker ‘Wa’ in Japanese,erns yield different scope readings (Féry 1993, Büring 1997, and Krifka 1998, among others; see section 3 below). This paper discusses how pragmatic information, prosody, and semantic interpretation are related. The empirical domain on which I focus concerns the pragmatics, prosody, and semantics of the topic marker . in Japanese.

encomiast

mendacity

Enrage

GLEAN

The Intonational Realization of Contrastive Focus in Chickasaw,ax has been studied relatively extensively, e.g. English (Beckman and Pierrehumbert 1986), Korean (Cho 1990, Jun 1993), Chichewa (Kanerva 1990), Bengali (Hayes and Lahiri 1991, Lahiri and Fitzpatrick-Cole 1999), Shanghai Chinese (Selkirk and Shen 1990), Hungarian (Horvath 1986, Kiss 1998), Hausa (In

Exposition

Types of Focus in English,tural constraints. This view is contrasted with one in which the pitch accent directly signals the information status of the word it occurs on. The second aim, pursued in section 2.0, is to show that there isn’t just a single semantic contrast between ‘old’ and ‘new’ information: languages express v