找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Theories on Law and Ageing; The Jurisprudence of Israel Doron Book 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009 Ageing.Elder Law.Jurispruden

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 21656|回復(fù): 35
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:41:11 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Theories on Law and Ageing
副標(biāo)題The Jurisprudence of
編輯Israel Doron
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/924/923481/923481.mp4
概述Comprehensive review of contemporary theories and approaches in the field of law and ageing.Combination of jurisprudential discussion of law and ageing with specific case law analysis.Written by the l
圖書封面Titlebook: Theories on Law and Ageing; The Jurisprudence of Israel Doron Book 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009 Ageing.Elder Law.Jurispruden
描述This book is about trying to answer questions. These questions were well introduced by Prof. Margaret Hall in the opening of her chapter in this book: “The fundamental idea of ‘law and aging’ as a discrete category of legal principle and theory is controversial: how and why are ‘older adults’ or ‘seniors’ or ‘elders’ (the very terminology is controversial and fraught with difficulties) a discrete and distinct group for whom ‘special’ legal thought and treatment is justified? For some, a category of law and aging is inherently paternalistic, suggesting that older persons are, like children, especially in need of the protection of the law. In this sense, the argument continues, the category itself internalizes ageist presumptions about older adults and is therefore inherently flawed and even harmful. If certain older adults are, because of physical or mental infirmities, genuinely in need of an enhanced level of legal protection, this entitlement should be conceptualized in terms of their disability; older adults are not a distinct group but an arbitrarily delineated demographic category which contains within it any number of groups that are legitimately distinct for the purposes of
出版日期Book 2009
關(guān)鍵詞Ageing; Elder Law; Jurisprudence; Law and Ageing; gerontology
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78954-3
isbn_softcover978-3-642-09772-0
isbn_ebook978-3-540-78954-3
copyrightSpringer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Theories on Law and Ageing影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Theories on Law and Ageing影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Theories on Law and Ageing網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Theories on Law and Ageing網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Theories on Law and Ageing被引頻次




書目名稱Theories on Law and Ageing被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Theories on Law and Ageing年度引用




書目名稱Theories on Law and Ageing年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Theories on Law and Ageing讀者反饋




書目名稱Theories on Law and Ageing讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 23:04:18 | 只看該作者
第123481主題貼--第2樓 (沙發(fā))
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:20:09 | 只看該作者
板凳
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:27:40 | 只看該作者
第4樓
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:28:41 | 只看該作者
5樓
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:31:14 | 只看該作者
6樓
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 20:46:33 | 只看該作者
7樓
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 21:39:41 | 只看該作者
8樓
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:46:03 | 只看該作者
9樓
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:22:00 | 只看該作者
10樓
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-25 20:56
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
尚志市| 南阳市| 涟水县| 湘阴县| 汨罗市| 文登市| 鄂伦春自治旗| 凌海市| 沂水县| 新民市| 六枝特区| 南溪县| 三亚市| 五大连池市| 渑池县| 万州区| 石台县| 遂川县| 襄垣县| 澄江县| 偏关县| 神木县| 偃师市| 吴堡县| 新平| 台湾省| 永顺县| 若羌县| 绍兴县| 岐山县| 临汾市| 孟州市| 商洛市| 成安县| 烟台市| 通河县| 临泉县| 松潘县| 永昌县| 无为县| 梅州市|