找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: The Un-Polish Poland, 1989 and the Illusion of Regained Historical Continuity; Tomasz Kamusella Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) an

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 53292|回復(fù): 35
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:15:32 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱The Un-Polish Poland, 1989 and the Illusion of Regained Historical Continuity
編輯Tomasz Kamusella
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/922/921621/921621.mp4
概述Analyses in depth the Polish national myth of historical continuity between Poland-Lithuania and today’s Polish nation-state.Develops further the criticism of the overemphasis on the idea of continuit
圖書封面Titlebook: The Un-Polish Poland, 1989 and the Illusion of Regained Historical Continuity;  Tomasz Kamusella Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) an
描述.This book discusses historical continuities and discontinuities?between the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, interwar Poland, the Polish People’s Republic, and contemporary Poland. The year 1989 is seen as a clear point-break that allowed the Poles and their country to regain a ‘natural historical continuity’ with the ‘Second Republic,’ as interwar Poland is commonly referred to in the current Polish national master narrative. In this pattern of thinking about the past, Poland-Lithuania (nowadays roughly coterminous with Belarus, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Russia’s Kaliningrad Region and Ukraine) is seen as the ‘First Republic.’ However, in spite of this ‘politics of memory’ (.Geschichtspolitik.) – regarding its borders, institutions, law, language, or ethnic and social makeup – present-day Poland, in reality, is the direct successor to and the continuation of communist Poland. Ironically, today’s Poland is very different, in all the aforementioned aspects, from the First and Second Republics. Hence, contemporary Poland is quite .un.-Polish, indeed, from the perspective of Polishness defined as a historical (that is, legal, social, cultural, ethnic and political) continuity of Pola
出版日期Book 2017
關(guān)鍵詞Ethnicity; Lithuania; Eastern Europe; Central Europe; Geschichtspolitik; Language Politics; national maste
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60036-9
isbn_softcover978-3-319-86764-9
isbn_ebook978-3-319-60036-9
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱The Un-Polish Poland, 1989 and the Illusion of Regained Historical Continuity影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱The Un-Polish Poland, 1989 and the Illusion of Regained Historical Continuity影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱The Un-Polish Poland, 1989 and the Illusion of Regained Historical Continuity網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱The Un-Polish Poland, 1989 and the Illusion of Regained Historical Continuity網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱The Un-Polish Poland, 1989 and the Illusion of Regained Historical Continuity被引頻次




書目名稱The Un-Polish Poland, 1989 and the Illusion of Regained Historical Continuity被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱The Un-Polish Poland, 1989 and the Illusion of Regained Historical Continuity年度引用




書目名稱The Un-Polish Poland, 1989 and the Illusion of Regained Historical Continuity年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱The Un-Polish Poland, 1989 and the Illusion of Regained Historical Continuity讀者反饋




書目名稱The Un-Polish Poland, 1989 and the Illusion of Regained Historical Continuity讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:17:32 | 只看該作者
第121621主題貼--第2樓 (沙發(fā))
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:17:15 | 只看該作者
板凳
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:32:38 | 只看該作者
第4樓
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:41:43 | 只看該作者
5樓
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:52:29 | 只看該作者
6樓
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:03:01 | 只看該作者
7樓
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:42:42 | 只看該作者
8樓
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:43:44 | 只看該作者
9樓
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:23:55 | 只看該作者
10樓
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-7 05:40
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
贵港市| 方城县| 孝义市| 渑池县| 柘城县| 巍山| 客服| 巴南区| 定远县| 凉城县| 登封市| 南川市| 闻喜县| 北海市| 西和县| 平原县| 蓬溪县| 高清| 枣强县| 内乡县| 绥化市| 韩城市| 襄垣县| 黔南| 利津县| 左权县| 涞水县| 彭泽县| 高淳县| 临西县| 广南县| 岳阳市| 进贤县| 上饶县| 佛学| 菏泽市| 鹤山市| 略阳县| 兴安盟| 永新县| 巩义市|