找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: The Presence of Duns Scotus in the Thought of Edith Stein; The question of indi Francesco Alfieri Book 2015 Springer International Publishi

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 51672|回復(fù): 35
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:09:07 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱The Presence of Duns Scotus in the Thought of Edith Stein
副標(biāo)題The question of indi
編輯Francesco Alfieri
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/918/917569/917569.mp4
概述Is the first thorough and systematic comparison of Duns Scotus and Edith Stein.Addresses a question that was crucial to Scotus and Stein and is still relevant today.Is the only book that critically an
叢書名稱Analecta Husserliana
圖書封面Titlebook: The Presence of Duns Scotus in the Thought of Edith Stein; The question of indi Francesco Alfieri Book 2015 Springer International Publishi
描述This book examines the phenomenological anthropology of Edith Stein. It specifically focuses on the question which Stein addressed in her work Finite and Eternal Being: What is the foundational principle that makes the individual unique and unrepeatable within the human species? Traditional analyses of Edith Stein’s writings have tended to frame her views on this issue as being influenced by Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas, while neglecting her interest in the lesser-known figure of Duns Scotus. Yet, as this book shows, with regard to the question of individuality, Stein was critical of Aquinas’ approach, finding that of Duns Scotus to be more convincing. In order to get to the heart of Stein’s readings of Duns Scotus, this book looks at her published writings and her personal correspondence, in addition to conducting a meticulous analysis of the original codexes on which her sources were based. Written with diligence and flair, the book critically evaluates the authenticity of Stein’s sources and shows how the position of Scotus himself evolved. It highlights the originality of Stein’s contribution, which was to rediscover the relevance of Mediaeval scholastic thought and reinterpret
出版日期Book 2015
關(guān)鍵詞Concretion - empty form - qualitative filling; G?ttingen circle; Intangible singularity; Intrinsecum pr
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15663-7
isbn_softcover978-3-319-38639-3
isbn_ebook978-3-319-15663-7Series ISSN 0167-7276 Series E-ISSN 2542-8330
issn_series 0167-7276
copyrightSpringer International Publishing Switzerland 2015
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱The Presence of Duns Scotus in the Thought of Edith Stein影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱The Presence of Duns Scotus in the Thought of Edith Stein影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱The Presence of Duns Scotus in the Thought of Edith Stein網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱The Presence of Duns Scotus in the Thought of Edith Stein網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱The Presence of Duns Scotus in the Thought of Edith Stein被引頻次




書目名稱The Presence of Duns Scotus in the Thought of Edith Stein被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱The Presence of Duns Scotus in the Thought of Edith Stein年度引用




書目名稱The Presence of Duns Scotus in the Thought of Edith Stein年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱The Presence of Duns Scotus in the Thought of Edith Stein讀者反饋




書目名稱The Presence of Duns Scotus in the Thought of Edith Stein讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:40:03 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:59:21 | 只看該作者
The Presence of Duns Scotus in the Thought of Edith SteinThe question of indi
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:42:15 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:52:28 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 14:15:03 | 只看該作者
978-3-319-38639-3Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:42:54 | 只看該作者
The Presence of Duns Scotus in the Thought of Edith Stein978-3-319-15663-7Series ISSN 0167-7276 Series E-ISSN 2542-8330
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:57:53 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:53:38 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:09:13 | 只看該作者
Francesco AlfieriIs the first thorough and systematic comparison of Duns Scotus and Edith Stein.Addresses a question that was crucial to Scotus and Stein and is still relevant today.Is the only book that critically an
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-24 07:42
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
白城市| 乐山市| 海淀区| 屏南县| 张家口市| 会同县| 靖江市| 肥乡县| 玉林市| 中卫市| 佛教| 南宫市| 蓬莱市| 突泉县| 天祝| 辽阳县| 沭阳县| 东港市| 乌审旗| 靖安县| 汝阳县| 崇阳县| 丹江口市| 遂平县| 闽侯县| 海城市| 嘉义县| 布拖县| 尤溪县| 铜川市| 岱山县| 陵水| 留坝县| 友谊县| 芒康县| 文成县| 独山县| 营口市| 福清市| 花垣县| 贵港市|