找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: The Politics of Freedom of Expression; The Decisions of the Mark J Richards Book 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited 2013 civil rights.decisi

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 45252|回復(fù): 35
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:50:11 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱The Politics of Freedom of Expression
副標(biāo)題The Decisions of the
編輯Mark J Richards
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/918/917105/917105.mp4
概述A unique systematic analysis of US Supreme Court decisions.Of wide interest to scholars of politics and law.Part of Palgrave Macmillan‘s SocioLegal Studies series
叢書名稱Palgrave Socio-Legal Studies
圖書封面Titlebook: The Politics of Freedom of Expression; The Decisions of the Mark J Richards Book 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited 2013 civil rights.decisi
描述The principle of content-neutrality is the cornerstone of freedom of expression jurisprudence, protecting the core values of freedom of speech set out in the first amendment, whilst also enabling the government to place reasonable restrictions on protected speech. .The Politics of Freedom of Express.i.on. examines the US Supreme Court‘s decision-making in freedom of expression cases, from the Earl Warren Court in 1953 to the 2012 decisions of the John Roberts Court, assessing the extent to which the justices take into consideration their own political attitudes, jurisprudence and external factors such as federal government participation. In doing so, the book highlights the role of the civil rights movement in developing the content-neutrality jurisprudential regime.. .Establishing ‘jurisprudential regime theory‘ as a framework for incorporating the various factors that can affect decision-making, the author draws on quantitative, qualitative and interpretive methods in order to analyse the justices‘ changing treatment of content-based and content-neutral cases over time. This unique theoretical approach allows the text to push beyond the traditional ‘law versus politics‘ debate in
出版日期Book 2013
關(guān)鍵詞civil rights; decision-making; freedom; liberty; methodology; politics; state; statistical method; Supreme C
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/9781137277589
isbn_ebook978-1-137-27758-9Series ISSN 2947-9274 Series E-ISSN 2947-9282
issn_series 2947-9274
copyrightMacmillan Publishers Limited 2013
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱The Politics of Freedom of Expression影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱The Politics of Freedom of Expression影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱The Politics of Freedom of Expression網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱The Politics of Freedom of Expression網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱The Politics of Freedom of Expression被引頻次




書目名稱The Politics of Freedom of Expression被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱The Politics of Freedom of Expression年度引用




書目名稱The Politics of Freedom of Expression年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱The Politics of Freedom of Expression讀者反饋




書目名稱The Politics of Freedom of Expression讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 23:30:24 | 只看該作者
2947-9274 ioLegal Studies seriesThe principle of content-neutrality is the cornerstone of freedom of expression jurisprudence, protecting the core values of freedom of speech set out in the first amendment, whilst also enabling the government to place reasonable restrictions on protected speech. .The Politics
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:47:18 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:19:11 | 只看該作者
Book 2013on-making, the author draws on quantitative, qualitative and interpretive methods in order to analyse the justices‘ changing treatment of content-based and content-neutral cases over time. This unique theoretical approach allows the text to push beyond the traditional ‘law versus politics‘ debate in
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:17:56 | 只看該作者
Macmillan Publishers Limited 2013
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:36:07 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:40:02 | 只看該作者
Palgrave Socio-Legal Studieshttp://image.papertrans.cn/t/image/917105.jpg
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:12:35 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137277589civil rights; decision-making; freedom; liberty; methodology; politics; state; statistical method; Supreme C
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:33:47 | 只看該作者
Mark J RichardsA unique systematic analysis of US Supreme Court decisions.Of wide interest to scholars of politics and law.Part of Palgrave Macmillan‘s SocioLegal Studies series
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:05:02 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-8 05:21
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
柳江县| 治县。| 和平县| 和田县| 靖宇县| 天台县| 沾益县| 彭阳县| 承德市| 阿拉善左旗| 海原县| 黔江区| 丹东市| 定兴县| 宾阳县| 甘孜县| 涞水县| 赤城县| 镶黄旗| 井冈山市| 苍溪县| 达拉特旗| 望奎县| 余干县| 英山县| 洛川县| 古交市| 黄大仙区| 东乡| 体育| 哈巴河县| 夏邑县| 和平县| 通城县| 安吉县| 祁门县| 博客| 乌拉特中旗| 西安市| 石门县| 霍邱县|