找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: The Paradoxes of Modernity; Creating Belief thro Zachary Simpson Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 38679|回復(fù): 35
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:09:31 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱The Paradoxes of Modernity
副標題Creating Belief thro
編輯Zachary Simpson
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/917/916020/916020.mp4
概述Offers an interdisciplinary examination of a paradox that lies at the heart of modernity.Serves as both an essay in the history of Western thought as well as a constructive argument.Asks and answers m
圖書封面Titlebook: The Paradoxes of Modernity; Creating Belief thro Zachary Simpson Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive
描述A paradox lies at the heart of modernity: the simultaneous demand to create ideas to make us better humans and communities, along with the contrary imperative that we criticize all ideals, especially the ones we have created. In philosophy we see this paradox most acutely in figures like Immanuel Kant, who states that we cannot know the essence of things and yet we must retain old ideas – God, freedom, and the soul – in order to become better and more ethical humans. Or in Friedrich Nietzsche, whose eternal recurrence, a self-created myth whose sole purpose is to get us to see the value in the everyday. This basic scheme – belief and un-belief – is one of the fundamental elements of modernity, manifesting itself in the philosophies of Herbert Marcuse and Michel Foucault, along with the theologies of Blaise Pascal, C.S. Lewis, William James, Sallie McFague, and Philip Clayton..How do we live out the values we know to be constructions? This question holds captiveour ability to solve public goods problems and make our lives more meaningful. Instead of seeing this paradox of modernity as self-deception or bad faith, Zachary Simpson employs cognitive and social scientific research to ex
出版日期Book 2022
關(guān)鍵詞Herbert Marcuse; Michel Foucault; Blaise Pascal; C; S; Lewis; Sallie McFague; Philip Clayton; William James
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99056-5
isbn_softcover978-3-030-99058-9
isbn_ebook978-3-030-99056-5
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱The Paradoxes of Modernity影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱The Paradoxes of Modernity影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱The Paradoxes of Modernity網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱The Paradoxes of Modernity網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名




書目名稱The Paradoxes of Modernity被引頻次




書目名稱The Paradoxes of Modernity被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱The Paradoxes of Modernity年度引用




書目名稱The Paradoxes of Modernity年度引用學科排名




書目名稱The Paradoxes of Modernity讀者反饋




書目名稱The Paradoxes of Modernity讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:41:36 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 04:07:12 | 只看該作者
http://image.papertrans.cn/t/image/916020.jpg
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:22:57 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:34:19 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:05:27 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:13:35 | 只看該作者
Book 2022ive out the values we know to be constructions? This question holds captiveour ability to solve public goods problems and make our lives more meaningful. Instead of seeing this paradox of modernity as self-deception or bad faith, Zachary Simpson employs cognitive and social scientific research to ex
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:41:37 | 只看該作者
solve public goods problems and make our lives more meaningful. Instead of seeing this paradox of modernity as self-deception or bad faith, Zachary Simpson employs cognitive and social scientific research to ex978-3-030-99058-9978-3-030-99056-5
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:13:05 | 只看該作者
9樓
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:32:58 | 只看該作者
10樓
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-20 19:44
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
宁河县| 庐江县| 龙山县| 绥化市| 盐源县| 卢氏县| 九江市| 小金县| 白水县| 明溪县| 遵义县| 九龙县| 株洲市| 济南市| 兰溪市| 汶川县| 肃南| 乌兰县| 彭州市| 康定县| 丹寨县| 海口市| 陆川县| 宜丰县| 襄樊市| 肇庆市| 宝鸡市| 务川| 永和县| 修文县| 新田县| 综艺| 大邑县| 固始县| 松江区| 阜康市| 贵定县| 嘉定区| 富川| 越西县| 驻马店市|