找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: The Concept of Rights; George W. Rainbolt Book 2006 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006 Consequentialism.H.L.A. Hart.Joseph Raz.mora

[復制鏈接]
查看: 28111|回復: 35
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:22:43 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱The Concept of Rights
編輯George W. Rainbolt
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/907/906595/906595.mp4
概述Defends an alternative both to interest/benefit theories of rights and to choice/will theories of rights.Solves the problem of the rights of past and future generations.Presents a new analysis of the
叢書名稱Law and Philosophy Library
圖書封面Titlebook: The Concept of Rights;  George W. Rainbolt Book 2006 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006 Consequentialism.H.L.A. Hart.Joseph Raz.mora
描述Discussions of rights are ubiquitous. One constantly hears things such as: “The Chinese are violating Tibetan rights,” “Landlords have a right that their tenants pay their rent,” “Students have a right to be graded fairly,” “Animals have a right not to suffer merely to bring pleasure to humans,” “Abortion violates a fetus’ right to life,” “We violate the rights of future generations when we pollute the water. ” These statements assert that Tibetans, landlords, students, animals, fetuses, and future generations all have rights. Tibetans, landlords, students, animals, fetuses, and future generations do not seem to have much in common. When one presses for clarity, it is very dif?cult to say precisely what a right is. What is it to have a right? That is the question this book seeks to answer. To paint with an overly broad brush, previous answers to this question can be divided into two groups. Some hold interest/bene?t theories of rights while others hold choice/will theories of rights. Perhaps the ?rst person to propose an interest/bene?t theory was Jeremy Bentham. Its most cited contemporary defender is Joseph Raz. The seminal statement of the choice theory was made by H. L. A. Hart
出版日期Book 2006
關(guān)鍵詞Consequentialism; H; L; A; Hart; Joseph Raz; morality; will
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3977-8
isbn_softcover978-90-481-7005-0
isbn_ebook978-1-4020-3977-5Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315
issn_series 1572-4395
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱The Concept of Rights影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱The Concept of Rights影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱The Concept of Rights網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱The Concept of Rights網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱The Concept of Rights被引頻次




書目名稱The Concept of Rights被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱The Concept of Rights年度引用




書目名稱The Concept of Rights年度引用學科排名




書目名稱The Concept of Rights讀者反饋




書目名稱The Concept of Rights讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 23:44:54 | 只看該作者
第106595主題貼--第2樓 (沙發(fā))
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:43:05 | 只看該作者
板凳
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:12:32 | 只看該作者
第4樓
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:47:57 | 只看該作者
5樓
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:31:07 | 只看該作者
6樓
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:13:08 | 只看該作者
7樓
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 00:01:35 | 只看該作者
8樓
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:44:53 | 只看該作者
9樓
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:03:24 | 只看該作者
10樓
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-12 21:58
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
南岸区| 宿松县| 陆良县| 高要市| 洮南市| 绥化市| 井研县| 洛隆县| 石林| 建昌县| 莱州市| 昌吉市| 马龙县| 花垣县| 塘沽区| 淳安县| 北川| 乌鲁木齐县| 五寨县| 文安县| 都匀市| 慈利县| 汤原县| 明水县| 梁平县| 延庆县| 曲阜市| 建瓯市| 当雄县| 永春县| 安宁市| 阿城市| 枞阳县| 阳朔县| 紫云| 墨玉县| 浙江省| 河北省| 察哈| 嘉义市| 普兰县|