找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: SCOTUS 2023; Major Decisions and Morgan Marietta,Howard Schweber Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusiv

[復制鏈接]
樓主: 根深蒂固
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 00:40:43 | 只看該作者
Students for Fair Admission v. Harvard on Affirmative Actiones employed by Harvard College and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Writing for himself and Justices Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett, Chief Justice Roberts declared that such policies stood for the proposition “that there is an inherent benefit in race qua race—in race
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 01:22:15 | 只看該作者
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 08:58:52 | 只看該作者
on the Constitutionality of the Indian Child Welfare Actages the adoptive placement of Native American children in Native American households. By a 7–2 vote, the Court repelled an arsenal of constitutional and statutory challenges to the Act and its operation through state courts. The ruling left the important question of ICWA’s compliance with equal pro
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 11:36:27 | 只看該作者
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 14:57:59 | 只看該作者
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 21:49:56 | 只看該作者
and the Regulation of Electionsed Independent State Legislature theory. Plaintiffs argued that the power to design congressional districts was derived solely from the Elections Clause (Art. I, Section?4) of the Constitution. The ability of other branches of government, notably including the judiciary, to tinker with legislative d
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 23:39:09 | 只看該作者
on the Jurisdiction of Administrative Law Judgestional challenges to administrative proceedings at the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Corporations and persons who may be regulated by administrative agencies may now bypass hearings by the administrative law judges (ALJ) within the executive agency when
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 05:08:41 | 只看該作者
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 07:54:04 | 只看該作者
on the Jurisdictional Limits of the Clean Water Acttates” to include certain wetlands. While EPA’s interpretation was broad, Supreme Court decisions had over the years concluded that only wetlands “adjacent” to a covered water were protected under the Act. In ., the Court unanimously rejected EPA’s interpretation of “adjacent.” Instead, five justice
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 14:30:29 | 只看該作者
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-6 09:17
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
德令哈市| 三门县| 紫金县| 连州市| 淅川县| 永寿县| 图木舒克市| 塘沽区| 大厂| 连南| 常州市| 阳山县| 阜新| 荥经县| 庆阳市| 临安市| 青龙| 门头沟区| 康定县| 杨浦区| 玉树县| 云安县| 阿拉善右旗| 新宁县| 海林市| 长顺县| 和顺县| 雷波县| 和林格尔县| 榕江县| 大丰市| 武穴市| 民乐县| 龙井市| 盐源县| 德州市| 长汀县| 南投市| 沂水县| 大渡口区| 江津市|