Titlebook: Sustained Dialogue in Conflicts; Transformation and C Harold H. Saunders,Teddy Nemeroff,Philip D. Stewar Book 2011 Palgrave Macmillan, a di

對將來事件

書目名稱Sustained Dialogue in Conflicts影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Sustained Dialogue in Conflicts影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Sustained Dialogue in Conflicts網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Sustained Dialogue in Conflicts網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Sustained Dialogue in Conflicts被引頻次




書目名稱Sustained Dialogue in Conflicts被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Sustained Dialogue in Conflicts年度引用




書目名稱Sustained Dialogue in Conflicts年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Sustained Dialogue in Conflicts讀者反饋




書目名稱Sustained Dialogue in Conflicts讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Chagrin

Thrombolysis

http://image.papertrans.cn/t/image/883618.jpg

phase-2-enzyme

Book 2011Citizens in our deeply, angrily divided world desperately need peaceful and productive ways of relating to each other. Rooted in four decades of intense experience in deep-seated human conflicts, Saunders presents a peaceful way of transforming destructive relationships and designing change.

案發(fā)地點

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137011817conflict; conflicts; Europe; Peace; Peace Process; Peacebuilding

角斗士

Prologue too often — perhaps because too many people in these organisations or groups have lost the capacity to relate peacefully and productively. Our politics has too often become meaninglessly combative. Too many decisions are addressed through confrontation. Too many interactions reflect incivility and rage. Identity conflicts confound governments.

jovial

Fluctuate

Talking, Listening, and Thinking Interactively Dialogue Experiencedel of interaction, but not without some trauma or maybe because of it. In one of those unknowable experiences with cause and effect, this readiness coincided with the beginnings of a thaw in the Soviet-U.S. relationship, commencing in the summer of 1984.

defuse

CAMP

Testing the Limitsspace where the potential of Sustained Dialogue might be further tested and developed. They chose the conflict involving Armenia and Azerbaijan around the heavily Armenian enclave within Azerbaijan known as Nagorno Karabakh. They deliberately chose this conflict — often called “intractable” — to explore the limits of Sustained Dialogue.