Titlebook: Substance in Aristotle‘s Metaphysics Zeta; Norman O. Dahl Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licen

POL

書目名稱Substance in Aristotle‘s Metaphysics Zeta影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Substance in Aristotle‘s Metaphysics Zeta影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Substance in Aristotle‘s Metaphysics Zeta網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Substance in Aristotle‘s Metaphysics Zeta網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Substance in Aristotle‘s Metaphysics Zeta被引頻次




書目名稱Substance in Aristotle‘s Metaphysics Zeta被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Substance in Aristotle‘s Metaphysics Zeta年度引用




書目名稱Substance in Aristotle‘s Metaphysics Zeta年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Substance in Aristotle‘s Metaphysics Zeta讀者反饋




書目名稱Substance in Aristotle‘s Metaphysics Zeta讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Antarctic

hat arise in trying to understand Z and what can be done to .This book argues that according to .Metaphysics .Zeta, substantial forms constitute substantial being in the sensible world, and individual composites make up the basic constituents that possess this kind of being. The study explains why A

壓迫

,The Universal as Substance: 1038b8–1039a3—Solutions to the Problems,idual composites basic constituents. Aristotle’s interlocutor thinks his view satisfies Z.13’s . assumption because its universals are essences only of objects immediately below them. Aristotle argues that this is mistaken, and adds two arguments that parallel 1038b8–15 and 1038b15–16.

BALE

Inculcate

必死

Z.1, Substantial Forms or Individual Composites as Basic Constituents,cept the interpretation that best fits the rest of Z. But until the rest of Z has been investigated, individual composites and substantial forms should each be regarded as candidates for basic constituents.

PATHY

Z.3, The Rejection of Matter,orm being what is puzzling and needs investigations. Two passages in Z.3 that have been thought to reject individual composites as basic constituents can be seen not to do so. Z.3 leaves substantial forms and individual composites as candidates for basic constituents.

pulmonary

Conflict

Z.6 and the Pale Man Argument,e recognizes are fallacious. An investigation of the details of what he says supports taking sameness in the pale man argument to be sameness in formula, and so to leave individual composites as candidates for basic constituents.

征兵