找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Structures in Science; Heuristic Patterns B Theo A. F. Kuipers Book 2001 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2001 ethics.philosophy.philos

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: fallacy
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 13:08:41 | 只看該作者
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 14:29:12 | 只看該作者
0166-6991 only a few 25 years. synthetic monographs and advanced textbooks have appeared in the last The philosophy of science seems to have lost its self-confidence. The main reason for such a loss is that the traditional analytical, logical-empiricist approaches to the philosophy of science had to make a n
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 18:50:34 | 只看該作者
Research Programs and Research Strategies and Lakatos. Kuhn first preferred the term ‘paradigm’ and later ‘disciplinary matrix’ (Kuhn, 1962/1969). Lakatos (1970, 1978) introduced the notion of a ‘research program’. Half a dozen other terms are used to denote roughly the same concept, although their details may differ.
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 22:12:30 | 只看該作者
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 03:31:29 | 只看該作者
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 08:37:09 | 只看該作者
‘Default-Norms’ in Research Ethicscteristic of the factual relation, but also as desirable, that is, in the interest of science and society, of course, under rationally defensible conditions. It concerns in particular moral dilemmas with respect to:
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 13:23:47 | 只看該作者
Book 2001w 25 years. synthetic monographs and advanced textbooks have appeared in the last The philosophy of science seems to have lost its self-confidence. The main reason for such a loss is that the traditional analytical, logical-empiricist approaches to the philosophy of science had to make a number of c
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 17:41:44 | 只看該作者
Observational Laws and Proper Theoriestinction in a defensible way. Without doubt, the distinction is strongly related to the distinction between observational (or empirical or experimental) and theoretical terms. Whereas proper theories introduce theoretical terms, observational laws do not. But how can one make sense of this term-dist
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 19:10:51 | 只看該作者
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 23:54:37 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-6 12:44
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
宜城市| 永德县| 广宗县| 招远市| 台北县| 游戏| 壤塘县| 深圳市| 长海县| 高碑店市| 疏附县| 揭西县| 漠河县| 吐鲁番市| 浦北县| 邯郸市| 枝江市| 阿坝| 南宁市| 景宁| 新干县| 迭部县| 通河县| 获嘉县| 黄大仙区| 谢通门县| 金坛市| 西峡县| 沾化县| 昆明市| 甘德县| 普安县| 海原县| 静安区| 天台县| 井冈山市| 崇礼县| 祁门县| 宁都县| 浠水县| 安福县|