Titlebook: Stem Cell Research; James M. Humber,Robert F. Almeder Book 2004 Springer Science+Business Media New York 2004 Embryo.cell.morality

披肩

Marginal Cases and the Moral Status of Embryos,ing. I conclude that early-term fetuses and human embryos have all of the protections extended to full members of the moral community. Lethal experimentation on early-term fetuses and human embryos therefore demands the sort of direct moral reasons that would justify lethal experimentation on more d

CIS

Fixations on the Moral Status of the Embryo,after gestation; exaggerating the significance of the embryo at the expense of other morally relevant considerations; and deliberating the issue solely within the contours of Western philosophical principles and values. Although there will most likely be no consensus on the embryo’s moral status, di

mechanical

Nazi Experiments and Stem Cell Research,to mid-1990s debate on the use of data from Nazi experiments during World War II. According to many leading Judaic ethicists and scholars, if the living require the data from unethical experiments to live or to have good lives, then it is morally permissible to use them for those purposes. On the sa

NOVA

Recent Ethical Controversies About Stem Cell Research,on of new human life and the transformation of human embryos into stem cells are often the “collateral damage” of this research, the focus is generally on how well off everyone would be if we could just develop the research into new and better therapeutic applications. Scientists working in these fi

Ischemia

頂點

Women, Commodification, and Embryonic Stem Cell Research,lation of stem cell research is unjust toward women because it alienates them from their reproductive labor. I agree that one criticism of the commodification of human reproductive capacities is the alienation of labor. A more significant critique of the commodification of human reproductive tissues

尊敬

Michael J. Almeidappendix we use Littelmann’s theory only in its simplest case, i.e. for GL . n Essential to my plan was to establish two basic facts connecting the op- ations of Schensted and Littelmann. To these “facts”, or rather conjectures, I gave the names Theorem A and Proposition B. Many examples suggested th

吹氣

無能力之人

凝乳

Michael C. Branniganorrected version of the original text, formatted A in LT X, and retaining the original numbering of sections, equations, etc. E The second is an Appendix, which is largely independent of the ?rst part, but whichleadstoanalgebraL(n,r),de?nedbyP.Littelmann,whichisanalogous to the Schur algebra S(n,r).