Titlebook: Standardization, Ideology and Linguistics; Nigel Armstrong,Ian E. Mackenzie Book 2013 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishe

novelty

Introduction,en theorized. Standardization is of course the manifestation of an ideology, and we consider here, as well as its effects on speakers in general, those which press upon the practitioners of linguistics, both in the ‘theoretical’ branches and in sub-disciplines relying on empirical methods.

Offstage

Prestige speech patterns,al outcomes, an individual’s competence in relation to a prestige speech pattern may be ‘imperfect’, in the sense that it fails to attain the highest levels of prescriptive adequacy, often due to a tendency to employ the pattern beyond its agreed domain of use. Fowler and Fowler (1922), for example,

nettle

Language change,ology of standardization. After that, in Section 4.3, we show how conceptualizing language change in terms of systemic change is problematic in a number of ways. As part of this, we examine the difficulties involved in reconciling the abruptness that is implicit in the notion of parameter resetting

omnibus

SPER

Away from the Anglo-Saxon model: the case of French,rance that sees democracy in the light of upward rather than downward levelling. Against this, it certainly makes sense to assume that the youth-driven changes discussed previously are at work in France; for example, the ‘events’ of May 1968 are above all associated with their French manifestation.

后天習(xí)得

絕種

嘲笑

Amylase

Book 2013The authors explore some of the ways in which standardization, ideology and linguistics are interrelated. Through a number of case studies they show how concepts such as grammaticality and structural change covertly rely on a false conceptualization of language, one that derives ultimately from standardization.

女歌星