Titlebook: Social Justice through Citizenship?; The Politics of Musl Aleksandra Lewicki Book 2014 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishe

complicated

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Social Justice through Citizenship?影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Social Justice through Citizenship?影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Social Justice through Citizenship?網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Social Justice through Citizenship?網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Social Justice through Citizenship?被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Social Justice through Citizenship?被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Social Justice through Citizenship?年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Social Justice through Citizenship?年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Social Justice through Citizenship?讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Social Justice through Citizenship?讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

顛簸地移動(dòng)

Introduction,’ of Muslims has arisen across Europe. At a recent security conference in Munich, for example, Chancellor Angela Merkel and Prime Minister David Cameron reiterated the tenuous but common, seemingly ‘causal’ link between multiculturalism and political terrorism (Euractiv 2011). According to the Germa

傻

Surgeon

Research Methodology,actors make use of the four discursive frames (civic republican, multicultural, civic universal and denationalized citizenship) and which claims they make on their basis. Introduced by a discussion of previous research on the German and British citizenship ‘regimes’, each case study examines the sal

災(zāi)禍

Coordinate

Institutionalized Consultations with Muslims in Great Britain,e UK and explore the discursive framing of claims for recognition and social integration. This chapter highlights the salience of the civic republican and the multicultural discourse, both of which have a focus on social solidarity. I show how the particular accentuation of social identifications as

惡臭

顯微鏡

The German Equal Treatment Act: Discrimination on Grounds of Religion,atment and show how civic republican and civic universal arguments were salient in the negotiation of the new law. The chapter indicates that the General Equal Treatment Act reflects an inconsequential interpretation and application of human rights standards to what appear as ‘familiar’ and ‘unfamil

septicemia

MONY

Social Justice and Citizenship,ship discourses, and helps to refocus these on to the requirements of social justice. The chapter thus revisits four influential citizenship discourses, notably civic republicanism, multiculturalism, civic universalism and denationalization and explores their capacity to account for a spectrum of structural impediments to parity of participation.