找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪(fǎng)問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Social Class, Social Action, and Education; The Failure of Progr Aaron Schutz Book 2010 Aaron Schutz 2010 civil rights.community.community

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 46982|回復(fù): 42
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:22:40 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Social Class, Social Action, and Education
副標(biāo)題The Failure of Progr
編輯Aaron Schutz
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/870/869337/869337.mp4
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: Social Class, Social Action, and Education; The Failure of Progr Aaron Schutz Book 2010 Aaron Schutz 2010 civil rights.community.community
描述Schutz demonstrates that progressive ideas of democracy emerged out of the practices of a new middle class, reacting, in part, against the more conflictive social struggles of the working-class. The volume traces two distinct branches of democratic progressivism: collaborative and personalist.
出版日期Book 2010
關(guān)鍵詞civil rights; community; community organizing; conflict; democracy; education; empowerment; John Dewey; soli
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/9780230113572
isbn_softcover978-1-349-29020-8
isbn_ebook978-0-230-11357-2
copyrightAaron Schutz 2010
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Social Class, Social Action, and Education影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Social Class, Social Action, and Education影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Social Class, Social Action, and Education網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Social Class, Social Action, and Education網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Social Class, Social Action, and Education被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Social Class, Social Action, and Education被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Social Class, Social Action, and Education年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Social Class, Social Action, and Education年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Social Class, Social Action, and Education讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Social Class, Social Action, and Education讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

1票 100.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶(hù)組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:20:00 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:48:40 | 只看該作者
Community Organizingmocratic practice in academia. This chapter turns away from these middle-class visions to examine an alternative approach I call “democratic solidarity,” drawn largely from working-class experiences and cultural practices: . in the tradition of Saul Alinsky.
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:35:17 | 只看該作者
Building Bridges?people who cling to impossible dreams of public “reason” and “collaboration” that have little relationship to the real workings of power in the lives of those who suffer in America. He had little use for middle-class progressives and their efforts to create a democratic society focused on the unique identities of individuals.
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:14:15 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:25:04 | 只看該作者
Book 2010Schutz demonstrates that progressive ideas of democracy emerged out of the practices of a new middle class, reacting, in part, against the more conflictive social struggles of the working-class. The volume traces two distinct branches of democratic progressivism: collaborative and personalist.
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 20:22:06 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230113572civil rights; community; community organizing; conflict; democracy; education; empowerment; John Dewey; soli
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 00:22:26 | 只看該作者
Overview: Schutz demonstrates that progressive ideas of democracy emerged out of the practices of a new middle class, reacting, in part, against the more conflictive social struggles of the working-class. The volume traces two distinct branches of democratic progressivism: collaborative and personalist.978-1-349-29020-8978-0-230-11357-2
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:40:00 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:51:13 | 只看該作者
Social Class and Social Action century since then, scholars across the social sciences and humanities have found different aspects of progressive democratic practice extremely compelling, even though few if any of their hopes for social transformation have ever come to fruition.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-18 04:25
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
清原| 景泰县| 江川县| 建宁县| 阿合奇县| 日土县| 天峻县| 镇原县| 宽城| 南华县| 伊宁县| 同仁县| 古浪县| 阳谷县| 澎湖县| 武功县| 中山市| 乐陵市| 临高县| 和平县| 安陆市| 胶州市| 唐海县| 获嘉县| 固安县| 桃江县| 霞浦县| 天祝| 玛曲县| 靖西县| 准格尔旗| 柯坪县| 鸡西市| 甘谷县| 巧家县| 古田县| 潼南县| 阜平县| 武隆县| 如皋市| 衡阳市|