找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Social Choice and Democratic Values; Eerik Lagerspetz Book 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016 Collective decision-mak

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: Limbic-System
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 11:52:49 | 只看該作者
On Voting, in Aristotle’s .. The chapter provides historically informed description of voting rules. When there are more than two alternatives, the most important criteria of reasonability or fairness are the Condorcet criterion, the Borda criterion, and the plurality criterion. Arguably, all the real-life me
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 17:30:07 | 只看該作者
,Arrow’s Theorem,ally, . methods of collective choice are bound to violate some plausible-looking conditions. In this chapter all the conditions used in the proof of Arrow’s Theorem are discussed one by one. I review the criticisms and proposals put forth in the literature on the Theorem, and try to show that in the
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 20:40:06 | 只看該作者
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 22:32:05 | 只看該作者
Pluralism and Majority Decision,es. Pluralist arrangements increase stability because they provide reasons for minorities to participate in democratic politics, and make the traditional problem of “majority tyranny” less relevant. The Rikerian “instability” of decisions may actually be a source of political stability. First, some
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 04:15:17 | 只看該作者
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 08:52:56 | 只看該作者
Some Conclusions,ictatorship and democratic chaos”, or between “l(fā)iberalism and populism” it has interesting connections to political philosophy. The social choice results are potentially relevant for the discussion on the virtues and vices of different real-life democratic mechanisms, and some traditional, non-techn
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 11:07:19 | 只看該作者
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 15:59:29 | 只看該作者
Some Conclusions,ical problems of political philosophy may actually be seen as instances of the more general problems revealed by the theory of social choice. Sometimes it is able to show that the problems have no “solution”, rather they should be seen as trade-offs between different values embodied in democratic institutions.
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 20:49:06 | 只看該作者
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 00:07:23 | 只看該作者
1614-0311 t also incorporates historical and empirical material.Offers.This book offers a comprehensive overview and critique of the most important political and philosophical interpretations of the basic results of social choice, assessing their plausibility and seeking to identify the links between the theo
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-6 18:31
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
大荔县| 平远县| 慈溪市| 鹤山市| 涞水县| 珲春市| 金沙县| 浪卡子县| 佛学| 永顺县| 宜城市| 苍山县| 福鼎市| 阜阳市| 罗江县| 中宁县| 固始县| 金山区| 杭锦后旗| 牡丹江市| 于田县| 韶关市| 扬州市| 罗平县| 瑞昌市| 会宁县| 石家庄市| 平塘县| 泰州市| 南澳县| 保山市| 平利县| 北安市| 东阿县| 安远县| 牡丹江市| 洞口县| 丹寨县| 乌兰县| 呼图壁县| 叶城县|