Titlebook: Science in Flux; Joseph Agassi Book 1975 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1975 Karl R. Popper.history of science.realism.t

Defect

書目名稱Science in Flux影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Science in Flux影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Science in Flux網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Science in Flux網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Science in Flux被引頻次




書目名稱Science in Flux被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Science in Flux年度引用




書目名稱Science in Flux年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Science in Flux讀者反饋




書目名稱Science in Flux讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

褻瀆

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1810-4Karl R; Popper; history of science; realism; theory of science

glans-penis

鬧劇

conception

Modified Conventionalism,er’s capacity. It is important, therefore, to distinguish between a philosopher’s desiderata. In different stages of his career, a philosopher may consider different desiderata and assume they do not conflict; but this assumption may be false.

他很靈活

Unity and Diversity in Science,her dangerous one..The Popperian view of rationality as a goal directed, i.e., as problem-solving, method of trial and error is a better view or rationality..Solutions to problems offer the element of unification, and their criticisms offer the element of diversification.

mastopexy

灰心喪氣

GEST

0068-0346 Overview: 978-90-277-0612-6978-94-010-1810-4Series ISSN 0068-0346 Series E-ISSN 2214-7942

草本植物

When Should we Ignore Evidence in Favour of a Hypothesis?,There is a supposition behind the title question: when should we ignore evidence in favour of a hypothesis? The supposition is, sometimes we may do so, sometimes we may not. Some philosophers have explicitly rejected this supposition, others have implicitly rejected it. Let me outline the brief history of this point.