Titlebook: SCOTUS 2022; Major Decisions and Morgan Marietta Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Spr

GOUGE

on Religious Expression in Schools and the Boundaries of the First Amendmente Gorsuch’s majority opinion for the 6-3 Court may have been the strangest opinion of all. Gorsuch declared his intention to read the Establishment Clause and the Free Speech Clause as “complementary” rather than in tension with one another; in the process, he effectively dissolved the boundaries th

FLIT

,, and , on the Pandemic Regulationshington DC, Governor’s mansions, and statehouses, as well as to expert civil servants in federal, state, and local executive branch agencies that focus on public health. But the Court’s exercise of judgment was still fundamental to the pandemic response.

Feckless

on Limiting the Enforcement of the , Rulingstituted Court” (as Justice Sotomayor phrased it in a different decision, .) to question, limit, or overrule seemingly settled precedent. . represents this trend with regard to . (1966). Described in 2000 (almost a quarter century ago) by Chief Justice Rehnquist in . as a “constitutionally based dec

固定某物

Lineage

on the Second Amendment and Concealed Carry Lawsmendment in the Court’s history, the majority rejected using the strict scrutiny standard, or even the lower standard of intermediate scrutiny—the interest balancing tests conventionally used to decide clashes between personal liberties and government powers.

過于光澤

on Limiting the Enforcement of the , Rulingision” that overrides contrary congressional statutes and must be applied as part of constitutional due process against the States, . gives all criminal defendants the right to exclude a confession from the prosecution’s case if the familiar . warnings are not first given before questioning in custody.

懸掛

Book 2023series describes, explains, and contextualizes the landmark cases of the US Supreme Court in the term ending 2022. With a close look at cases involving key issues and debates in American politics and society, .SCOTUS 2022. tackles the Court’s rulings on abortion, guns, religion, environmental regula

CROAK

on Abortion, if not in history. It also creates a playbook for other social movements—one centered on the idea that if the Supreme Court fails to settle a divisive issue, and if grassroots activists and state lawmakers express disapproval of a decision or circumvent it, that gives the Supreme Court reason to reverse course.

conduct

ODIUM