Titlebook: Russian Writers and Society in the Second Half of the Nineteenth Century; Joe Andrew Book 1982 Joe Andrew 1982 Russia.Russian.society

Remodeling

書目名稱Russian Writers and Society in the Second Half of the Nineteenth Century影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Russian Writers and Society in the Second Half of the Nineteenth Century影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Russian Writers and Society in the Second Half of the Nineteenth Century網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書目名稱Russian Writers and Society in the Second Half of the Nineteenth Century網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Russian Writers and Society in the Second Half of the Nineteenth Century被引頻次




書目名稱Russian Writers and Society in the Second Half of the Nineteenth Century被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Russian Writers and Society in the Second Half of the Nineteenth Century年度引用




書目名稱Russian Writers and Society in the Second Half of the Nineteenth Century年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Russian Writers and Society in the Second Half of the Nineteenth Century讀者反饋




書目名稱Russian Writers and Society in the Second Half of the Nineteenth Century讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

愚蠢人

Relinquish

Fyodor Dostoevsky,lace’; indeed, a comparison with Gogol (one which is frequently made). serves as a useful beginning in a process of demystification of Dostoevsky, an attempt, that is, to solve the mystery of this particular man.. Dostoevsky himself was aware of his special relationship with Gogol: the most celebrat

憎惡

Lev Tolstoy,onflicts of Russia in the second half of the nineteenth century on their own terms, and was accordingly intensely topical in his work, Tolstoy’s art and thought represent a rejection of the modern world. His answers are usually antihistorical, absolute. Tolstoy’s background and education provide the

harpsichord

Anton Chekhov, to this tradition. He had no connection with . or the ‘natural’ school; he had little concern with the metaphysical ‘a(chǎn)ccursed questions’; he revitalised the neglected genres of the previous forty years — the short story and the drama — and wrote no novels. Coincidentally his writing career began as

epinephrine

Ivan Turgenev,ed by many contemporary and later critics. Turgenev was much maligned for apparent lack of conviction, and today he may seem pallid in comparison with Tolstoy and Dostoevsky, but both these views pay scant justice to his art and deeply-held beliefs.

知識(shí)

venous-leak

Conclusion,In conclusion I would like to bring together the strands of discussion in the preceding chapters and point out the important underlying tendencies, concentrating on the areas of investigation suggested in the Introduction.

Adulterate

Overview: 978-1-349-04420-7978-1-349-04418-4

Ligament