Titlebook: Russian Legal Realism; Bartosz Bro?ek,Julia Stanek,Jerzy Stelmach Book 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018 L. Petrazycki Concept of L

辮子帶來幫助

declamation

Sergey Muromtsev: The Founder of Russian Sociological Jurisprudence,n this chapter, special attention was paid to the idea of the role of the judge in Muromtsev’s theory. He puts forward an original proposal that the role of judges should not only involve uncovering the will of the legislator but also “thinking over what has not been thought over by the legislator”.

Tortuous

廣告

The St. Petersburg School of Legal Philosophy and Russian Legal Thought,chool can be considered as an independent, local version of legal realism (its adherents include, inter alia, G. Guins, G. Ivanov, A. Kruglevsky, M. Laserson, P. Mikhailov, G. Gurvitch, N. Timasheff, P. Sorokin, S. Hessen, M. Reisner). The emergence of this school diversified the landscape of legal

Indicative

Law and Social Constructivism: The Russian School of the Legal Realism Reexamined,list movement. This will allow us to define its most common characteristics, its original ideas and general influence on the development of legal philosophy. Discussing the crisis of legal thought at the beginning of the twentieth century, the author shows the impact of Russian legal philosophy on o

accessory

The Theory of State and Law by Nikolay Korkunov,eas developed by the St. Petersburg school of legal philosophy, which was heavily influenced by Korkunov’s works. Korkunov created a realistic conception of law, based on a synthesis of positivism, sociology and psychology. Thus, Korkunov not only saw the normative (regulatory) dimension of law, but

Proclaim

GEM

,On Leon Petra?ycki’s Critical Realism and Legal Realism, legal phenomena can be regarded as a form of legal realism—if understood as critical realism applied to legal phenomena. In the first part of the chapter, the author presents Petra?ycki’s critical realism. Here, his theory of perception and his conceptualization of deduction/induction as a scientif

dapper

半身雕像

,Eugen Ehrlich and Leon Petra?ycki: Are Emotions a Viable Criterion to Distinguish Between Law and Mars defined the law by referring to special kinds of emotions: bilateral emotions in Petra?ycki’s conception and repulsive emotions of experiencing the wrong behavior of other people, according to Ehrlich’s legal sociology. On the basis of a comparison between the theories of Petra?ycki and Ehrlich,