找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Rousseau in Drag; Deconstructing Gende Rosanne Terese Kennedy Book 2012 Rosanne Terese Kennedy 2012 argue.biography.critique.equality.gende

[復制鏈接]
查看: 11092|回復: 38
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:53:25 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Rousseau in Drag
副標題Deconstructing Gende
編輯Rosanne Terese Kennedy
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/832/831943/831943.mp4
叢書名稱Breaking Feminist Waves
圖書封面Titlebook: Rousseau in Drag; Deconstructing Gende Rosanne Terese Kennedy Book 2012 Rosanne Terese Kennedy 2012 argue.biography.critique.equality.gende
描述Through a series of close readings of most of Rousseau‘s major writings, this book provides a new interpretation of the eighteenth-century philosopher‘s sexual politics. The text argues that Rousseau‘s writings provide a critique of not only normative gender identity, but also normative familial and kinship relations.
出版日期Book 2012
關鍵詞argue; biography; critique; equality; gender; Henri Rousseau; identity; interpret; Jean-Jacques Rousseau; Jea
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/9781137010629
isbn_softcover978-1-349-34268-6
isbn_ebook978-1-137-01062-9Series ISSN 2945-6991 Series E-ISSN 2945-7009
issn_series 2945-6991
copyrightRosanne Terese Kennedy 2012
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Rousseau in Drag影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Rousseau in Drag影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Rousseau in Drag網絡公開度




書目名稱Rousseau in Drag網絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Rousseau in Drag被引頻次




書目名稱Rousseau in Drag被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Rousseau in Drag年度引用




書目名稱Rousseau in Drag年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Rousseau in Drag讀者反饋




書目名稱Rousseau in Drag讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

1票 100.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:03:55 | 只看該作者
Introduction, relentlessly gendered political thought. At least, this has been the reigning consensus among his feminist readers. . This interpretation (despite readers’ different philosophical and political perspectives and aims) has focused on the ways in which Rousseau, the theorist who championed democratic
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:49:36 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:14:48 | 只看該作者
The Arts: From the , to ,ics. In 1757 an article written by Jean le Rond d’Alembert on the Republic of Geneva appeared in the seventh edition of the Encyclopedia. In his essay, “Geneva,” d’Alembert argued that the theater which was not permitted in Geneva at the time, should be. The theater, d’Alembert claimed, would give G
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:09:13 | 只看該作者
Postoedipal Desire: Reading the ,iguring sexual relations and as a consequence democratic relations. Of course, there has been no shortage of critics who have remarked on the significance of the . in Rousseau’s writings. Typically, though, these critics have considered the frequent appearance of . in his work as symptomatic of pers
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 14:23:26 | 只看該作者
Autobiography: Writing the Self, Writing Gender, to “giving an account of himself.”. Within this period, Rousseau writes no less than three autobiographies: the expansive, detailed .; the defensive .; and the lyrical, unfinished .. Each of these works has generated varying degrees of commentary. The . has incited a great deal of commentary and in
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:22:13 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:42:42 | 只看該作者
Autobiography: Writing the Self, Writing Gender,ed a large amount of attention from a variety of disciplines (literature, philosophy, psychology); it can even be considered to have generated its own—memoir writing. The most obscure of Rousseau’s autobiographical works remain the ., no doubt because of its strange structure, not to mention the unusual circumstances of its publication.
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 02:32:40 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:22:13 | 只看該作者
Conclusion,sition of such instability was intended to indicate the instability of the very categories “masculine” and “feminine.” Furthermore, I wanted to reconsider (as Rousseau does) the possibility of rethinking our most basic assumptions concerning kinship relations—the “couple,” the family—and the relationship of these to the political/state.
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網 吾愛論文網 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-6 18:32
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
宝丰县| 新津县| 辉县市| 邢台县| 北安市| 云浮市| 闽清县| 伊吾县| 淮阳县| 扶风县| 邵武市| 刚察县| 汤原县| 武陟县| 沂源县| 北海市| 南郑县| 太保市| 洛宁县| 海城市| 常熟市| 乐平市| 宁乡县| 红安县| 千阳县| 浦县| 武汉市| 安丘市| 元江| 印江| 荔波县| 兴业县| 桐乡市| 南投县| 永仁县| 白山市| 什邡市| 盐池县| 延边| 东辽县| 攀枝花市|