Titlebook: Rosa Luxemburg; Her Life and Legacy Jason Schulman Book 2013 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2013 politics.revolution

一美元

反抗者

GRIEF

Rosa Redux Ad Absurdum, unknown, but its discovery was announced with little advance fanfare, but with much subsequent consternation in the Summer 2001 and Winter 2001–2002 issues of .. In making his case, Stephen brought to bear, with the typical erudition, clarity of presentation and impish wit that makes his fortunate

gangrene

Moving On: New Replies to New Critics,nd meaning of socialism. My previous encounter with David Camfield and Alan Johnson has now inspired a debate with Paul Le Blanc and Barry Finger—important representatives of what might be termed “councilist Leninism” and valuable contributors to . as well as Michael Thompson, who, having published

言行自由

Between Gospel and Church: Resisting the Canonization of Rosa Luxemburg,isms, an extended sympathy to the most vulgar of Marxists, and enough exposure to academia to solidify my adamant position of avoidance whenever possible. My qualifications (or lack thereof, some might argue) to participate in this project are rooted in my presence among Marxist thinkers, far more t

敲詐

Where Do We Go from Here? Rosa Luxemburg and the Crisis of Democratic Capitalism,beral democracy has been effectively annulled. Citizenries throughout the world are outraged by increasing inequality, unemployment, and poverty, but the political elites of the established parties (from nominally center-left or Social Democratic parties as well as the conservatives) have shown litt

deviate

Contra Bronner on Luxemburg and Working-Class Revolution,, and boots. My father, a German Social Democrat in his youth—more for the party’s wraparound social and cultural services than its particular ideology—asked me if I was going out to meet Rosa Luxemburg. I didn’t know who that was, but she sounded good.

GRUEL

Red Dreams and the New Millennium: Notes on the Legacy of Rosa Luxemburg,nism. None of this, however, gives her any particular salience for the present. Luxemburg disliked turning personal issues into political ones. She would probably have noted that there were many less heralded men and women—just as sensitive and just as brave—who died just as tragically. Luxemburg would have said: “Look to my work.”

hypertension

A Critical Reply to Stephen Eric Bronner,persuasive. In Part 1 I suggest there are some general problems with this “post-Marxist” method of appropriating the legacy of Marxism. In Part 2 I challenge some of the new political conclusions Steve has drawn from his new Luxemburg.

Paleontology

A Second Reply to Stephen Eric Bronner,ropriate citations from her pamphlets and speeches” and his suggestion that the inadequacies of Luxemburg’s thought deserve to be treated much as Luxemburg critically appraised Marx’s work are praiseworthy.