找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Rorty, Liberal Democracy, and Religious Certainty; Neil Gascoigne Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2019 Epistemic

[復制鏈接]
查看: 27568|回復: 36
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:43:29 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Rorty, Liberal Democracy, and Religious Certainty
編輯Neil Gascoigne
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/832/831802/831802.mp4
概述Argues for a new epistemological position called Pragmatist Fideism.Marries a technical discussion of reformed epistemology with a discussion of Rorty‘s position on religious claims in democratic poli
圖書封面Titlebook: Rorty, Liberal Democracy, and Religious Certainty;  Neil Gascoigne Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2019 Epistemic
描述.This book asks whether there any limits to the sorts of religious considerations that can be raised in public debates, and if there are, by whom they are to be identified. Its starting point is the work of Richard Rorty, whose pragmatic pluralism leads him to argue for a politically motivated anticlericalism rather than an epistemologically driven atheism. Rather than defend Rorty’s position directly, Gascoigne argues for an epistemological stance he calls ‘Pragmatist Fideism’.. .The starting point for this exercise in what Rorty calls ‘Cultural Politics’ is an acknowledgement that one must appeal to both secularists?.and?.those with religious commitments. In recent years ‘reformed’ epistemologists have aimed to establish a parity of epistemic esteem between religious and perceptual beliefs by exploiting an analogy in respect of their mutual vulnerability to sceptical challenges. Through an examination of this analogy, and in light of Wittgenstein’s?.On Certainty., this book argues that understood correctly the ‘parity’ argument in fact lends epistemological support to the argument that religious considerations should not be raised in public debate. The political price paid—paying
出版日期Book 2019
關鍵詞Epistemic parity; Rorty; Pluralism; Public debate; Tolerance; Exclusivism; religious belief
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25454-4
isbn_softcover978-3-030-25456-8
isbn_ebook978-3-030-25454-4
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2019
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Rorty, Liberal Democracy, and Religious Certainty影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Rorty, Liberal Democracy, and Religious Certainty影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Rorty, Liberal Democracy, and Religious Certainty網絡公開度




書目名稱Rorty, Liberal Democracy, and Religious Certainty網絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Rorty, Liberal Democracy, and Religious Certainty被引頻次




書目名稱Rorty, Liberal Democracy, and Religious Certainty被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Rorty, Liberal Democracy, and Religious Certainty年度引用




書目名稱Rorty, Liberal Democracy, and Religious Certainty年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Rorty, Liberal Democracy, and Religious Certainty讀者反饋




書目名稱Rorty, Liberal Democracy, and Religious Certainty讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:21:10 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:54:41 | 只看該作者
Neil Gascoigne provides not only rationales and methodologies (e.g., measuring resilience and similar elusive qualities) but also concrete examples of asset-based initiatives in use across the world on the individual and community levels.978-1-4899-9929-0978-1-4419-5921-8
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:06:46 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:14:31 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:57:35 | 只看該作者
Neil Gascoigne provides not only rationales and methodologies (e.g., measuring resilience and similar elusive qualities) but also concrete examples of asset-based initiatives in use across the world on the individual and community levels.978-1-4899-9929-0978-1-4419-5921-8
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 20:58:30 | 只看該作者
provides not only rationales and methodologies (e.g., measuring resilience and similar elusive qualities) but also concrete examples of asset-based initiatives in use across the world on the individual and community levels.978-1-4899-9929-0978-1-4419-5921-8
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 00:21:00 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:37:59 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:26:05 | 只看該作者
http://image.papertrans.cn/r/image/831802.jpg
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網 吾愛論文網 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-10 15:04
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
礼泉县| 岳阳县| 海林市| 松潘县| 安义县| 长岛县| 安仁县| 霍城县| 鱼台县| 阳西县| 武胜县| 新田县| 翁牛特旗| 日喀则市| 大余县| 鄂尔多斯市| 田林县| 昌图县| 集贤县| 黄陵县| 乡城县| 洪湖市| 安吉县| 兴海县| 陵水| 灵山县| 石家庄市| 察雅县| 乐至县| 景泰县| 汨罗市| 高邮市| 临高县| 肃宁县| 合川市| 遂平县| 平江县| 垦利县| 武夷山市| 保靖县| 化德县|