Titlebook: Ronald Johnson’s Modernist Collage Poetry; Ross Hair Book 2010 Ross Hair 2010 America.poetics.poetry.Romanticism

Lensometer

書目名稱Ronald Johnson’s Modernist Collage Poetry影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Ronald Johnson’s Modernist Collage Poetry影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ronald Johnson’s Modernist Collage Poetry網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Ronald Johnson’s Modernist Collage Poetry網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ronald Johnson’s Modernist Collage Poetry被引頻次




書目名稱Ronald Johnson’s Modernist Collage Poetry被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ronald Johnson’s Modernist Collage Poetry年度引用




書目名稱Ronald Johnson’s Modernist Collage Poetry年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ronald Johnson’s Modernist Collage Poetry讀者反饋




書目名稱Ronald Johnson’s Modernist Collage Poetry讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

光滑

Esophagus

Ronald Johnson’s Modernist Collage Poetry978-0-230-11555-2Series ISSN 2634-6052 Series E-ISSN 2634-6060

細(xì)頸瓶

Book 2010erican" collage tradition, stretching from Ezra Pound to Louis Zukofsky and beyond. Additionally, the book assesses Johnson‘s work in relation to wider questions concerning literary chronologies, especially the discontinuities commonly seen to exist between nineteenth-century Romantic and twentieth-century modernist literary forms.

jabber

Introduction,ions in 2001.. In these lines Johnson gives a lucid summary of a poetic vision that began in his debut collection, . some thirty years earlier. Over those decades, Johnson—like two of his major touchstones, Blake and Thoreau—would continue to pry into the miniscule details of the world to find intim

忙碌

mosque

Luminous Detail: Ezra Pound and Collage,s “New Transcendentalist” and Orphic visions, these early poems show Johnson tentatively utilizing a collage poetic (indebted to Olson) in the attempt to establish a form capable of enacting the visionary modes and ideas they describe. In other words, and despite the strong presence of Olson, form i

路標(biāo)

2634-6052 he "New American" collage tradition, stretching from Ezra Pound to Louis Zukofsky and beyond. Additionally, the book assesses Johnson‘s work in relation to wider questions concerning literary chronologies, especially the discontinuities commonly seen to exist between nineteenth-century Romantic and

不可接觸

Feigned