Titlebook: Romanticism and the Letter; Madeleine Callaghan,Anthony Howe Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive li

滋養(yǎng)物質(zhì)

書目名稱Romanticism and the Letter影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Romanticism and the Letter影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Romanticism and the Letter網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Romanticism and the Letter網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Romanticism and the Letter被引頻次




書目名稱Romanticism and the Letter被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Romanticism and the Letter年度引用




書目名稱Romanticism and the Letter年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Romanticism and the Letter讀者反饋




書目名稱Romanticism and the Letter讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

門窗的側(cè)柱

,The Disappointment of Wordsworth’s Letters,lincourt’s editions of Wordsworth’s letters he noted the ‘substantial interest’ they would attract but conceded: ‘it is still true that these letters are disappointing’. Beth Darlington’s fetching edition of ., published in 1981, warned that anyone looking for ‘sizzling rhetoric’ ‘may be disappointe

白楊魚

Two Wordsworths: Mountain-climbing, Letter-writing,intimate with her brother in any event, would have in mind William Wordsworth’s iconic mountain ascents, the ‘missed crossing’ of the Alps, with his friend Robert Jones, in 1790, and the ascent of Mount Snowdon, also with Jones, in 1791. So, Dorothy Wordsworth’s letter is tacitly intertextual, compa

小蟲

,‘Hare and Hound’: Ends and Means in Coleridge’s Letters,he was immediately and amusedly self-conscious (‘Digress? or not digress? That’s now no question’ (CL V. p. 99)). It was a trait he had long recognised in himself, as he admitted to his friend Thomas Poole:

Petechiae

,The ‘Entire Man of Letters’?: Robert Southey, Correspondence and Romantic Incompleteness, that were ‘unavoidably incomplete’ were, in turn, dismissed as substandard and unfit for purpose. Paradoxically, Southey was himself beset by the incompleteness he abhorred, and he admitted that his own published oeuvre was anything but complete. This was, he explained, something for which he was n

gruelling

Heretical

撫育

,‘Transported to your presence’: Leigh Hunt’s Letters to the Shelleys,himself and his correspondents, as well as Hunt’s understanding of the letter as a vehicle of mobility, a space in which a writer must adopt varying postures and positions depending on the needs of his correspondent and the communicative situation. Having first met in 1811, Hunt and Shelley forged a

事與愿違

flaggy