Titlebook: Romanticism and Masculinity; Gender, Politics and Tim Fulford Book 1999 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1999

aspect

,Coleridge in the 1790s: ‘Lord of Thy Utterance’, of Burke—Wollstonecraft, Godwin, Radcliffe, Matthew Lewis and Thomas Malthus amongst prose writers, Mary Robinson and William Wordsworth amongst poets. Common to Coleridge’s different responses to these authors was an interest in how their language might offer a way beyond discourses which served p

Magisterial

,‘Manly Reflection’: Masculinity in Coleridge’s Criticism, In critical prose he attempted to find solutions for his poetic failings, his personal anxieties, and the nation’s social and political ills. Wishing to restore respect for his writerly authority, and for established authority more generally, Coleridge developed Burke’s gendered analysis of power’s

Enteropathic

Sexual Politics: Burke,Coleridge and Cobbett, saw Southey attacked. And he saw the new King George undermine belief in aristocratic chivalry in the nation. As a result it became impossible simply to offer his own literary style as an example of the chivalric manliness needed in the government of the self and the nation. If Coleridge did not ch

CONE

聽寫

De Quincey and Hazlitt: To Have and Have Not the Power, Quincey and Hazlitt took their own critical and political positions, and sought authority through rhetoric, after the examples provided by the older writers’ versions of masculinity. And yet their positions came to differ in several respects, not least politi-cally, as De Quincey became an arch con

協(xié)迫

cal debates of Regency Britain and argues that their response to Burke‘s gendered discourse about power effected radical changes in the definitions of masculinity and femininity. It portrays their influence on each other as a series of unstable struggles and alliances in which the formulation of an

Foolproof

LVAD360

內(nèi)疚

Burke: the Gendering of Power,the diagnosis he made of the spirit of the age in general. For Hazlitt, politicians, poets and theorists fled from the intellectual divisions and contradictions that threatened their authority into metaphysical dreamlands or apologies for established powers, rather than into the common sense of the

Androgen