Titlebook: Romantic Paganism; The Politics of Ecst Suzanne L. Barnett Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licen

自由

書目名稱Romantic Paganism影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Romantic Paganism影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Romantic Paganism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Romantic Paganism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Romantic Paganism被引頻次




書目名稱Romantic Paganism被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Romantic Paganism年度引用




書目名稱Romantic Paganism年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Romantic Paganism讀者反饋




書目名稱Romantic Paganism讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Increment

HUMID

意外的成功

,“Prattling about Greece and Rome”: Paganism, Presumption, and Gender,ry critics as both presumptuous and either troublingly sensual or suspiciously effeminate. By adopting classical tales by Ovid and Sappho, women writers could circumvent the taboo against women writing about sexuality and avoid (or forestall) critical censure. Keats’ and Hunt’s “pretty paganisms” an

竊喜

DAFT

壓碎

pellagra

Introduction: Pretty Paganisms and Satanic Schools, Barnett also defines many of the project’s key terms including, of course, “pagan,” which in the context of this project signals a way of thinking about sexuality and other sensual pleasures, music, excess, joyous celebration, and communal experiences as both conscious subversion and literary experimentation.

laparoscopy

2946-3017 ritish Romanticism.Explores the idea that the Shelley circleThis book addresses the function of the classical world in the cultural imaginations of the second generation of romantic writers: Percy Shelley, Mary Shelley, Thomas Love Peacock, John Keats, Leigh Hunt, and the rest of their diverse circl

險代理人

Book 2017 Shelley, Thomas Love Peacock, John Keats, Leigh Hunt, and the rest of their diverse circle. The younger romantics inherited impressions of the ancient world colored by the previous century, in which classical studies experienced a resurgence, the emerging field of comparative mythography investigat